June 12, 2012

Field trips

Places I need to visit that are within a day trip length 'cause this year's vacation time looks to be pretty non-existant with The Girl in UC summer classes all summer.



  • Entertrainment Junction, West Chester, OH - This one's like ten minutes from my house, and I have a Groupon for entry for two before the end of June. I'm going to see this one for certain this summer.



  • Toy and Plastic Brick Museum, Bellaire, OH - It's a very unofficial Lego museum over on the far eastern edge of Ohio. I'm thinking I'm a gonna check it out this summer. I especially dig the downhome vibe because this museum is a total labor of love for one guy. I dig it, and I feel like supporting him. I just wish his online shop was actually up and running. Four hour drive away...hopefully it's a little more joyous than the building's outside looks to be.
  • Brazee Street Studios, Cincinnati, OH - There's a glass art studio here in town. Might as well check out the work over there 'cause I love glass artwork.


  • Kokomo Opalescent Glass, Kokomo, IN - One of the other master teachers with the ASM summer camps (material science stuff...I'll be in Houston in a week or so teaching their stuff) says this factory is a must to be seen. Kokomo's only three hours away from home for me. 
What other places should I check out? My limit is about the four hours drive for the not-Lego museum.

June 11, 2012

I'm conflicted

Dasmine Cathey leaves me conflicted, and I'll get to why in a second. First, though, a little background.


Damine Cathey is a student at the University of Memphis. He's also a scholarship football player who grew up in less than ideal circumstances in Memphis, choosing to stay near home for college so that he could help his family and friends while he was in school. Dasmine is - from what we see in this article from the Chronicle of Higher Education - an admirable individual. He is humble enough to acknowledge that he wasn't ready for college work and willing to do that inglorious, sometimes demeaning work needed to build up his skills so to a point where he is almost ready for college level work. Throughout his time at UMemphis, Cathey drove his friends and family to jobs, used his meal and lodging allotment to help pay other people's bills, and managed to better himself academically.

Dasmine Cathey is to be admired. He is a hard worker and an excellent role model.

And I'm not sure he ever should have been in college in the first place.

How does a young man who can't read beyond a first-grade level graduate from high school? How does the University of Memphis accept a student with those skills? How can a university be expected to meet the needs both of a young man like Dasmine Cathey as well as National Merit Scholars?

Our educational system is drastically flawed when a full scholarship is awarded to a student who isn't remotely ready for college work, when such a young man is able to graduate high school with the belief that he is ready for college work.

I write this knowing that I have passed students in the same situations, have helped students pass the OGT who could barely read. Princeton isn't without sin in this situation. Our success or failure is measured on how many students we graduate, not how many students we prepare for life. We're encouraged to play the numbers in ways that make us look good - whether that means nudging discipline a little to make sure students are coming to school frequently enough for us to make the 93% attendance hurdle or whether it means easing requirements a little so that students earn enough credits to graduate. And if we don't meet our needs, we get pilloried in the press and  lose students to the local private schools.

Even when we do our job, we lose funding and are asked to do more - to educate the same students who are coming to us with less preparation and weaker home support - with fewer people.

I have no clue, by the way, how to fix this without pretty well solving all of our social problems along the way.

Oh, I should mention that I have a distant connection to the story of Dasmine Cathey. Joe Luckey - the guy in the tie there, Memphis's director of athletic academic services, is the brother of a friend of mine.

June 10, 2012

Men, interrupted

Nadal leads two sets to one over Novak Djokovic in the Roland Garros final after today's final rain delay/darkness postponment.

Tomorrow the final resumes but on NBC Sports Channel - not the broadcast network.

Looks like I'll be watching flat on my back on the intertubes.

Check the great photo of Nadal from the Roland Garros Facebook page...


Morning activities

I threw my back out yesterday spreading mulch in the garden, and I'm looking at a day or two flat on my back recuperating. Happy summer, moron. Lose some weight, get in shape.

Luckily, there's Nadal-Djokovic in the Roland Garros final this morning. Their last grand slam match - the Aussie Open final - went nearly six hours (and, yes, somebody uploaded the whole thing to YouTube), and this is a far slower surface.

The smart money is firmly on Nadal to win his open-era record seventh Roland Garros title, but I'm pulling for Djokovic to complete the career Grand Slam and be the first man to hold all four titles since Rod Laver in 1969.


June 9, 2012

Let's Celebrate!

Happy birthday to Johnny Depp, Wayman Tisdale, George Pérez, Michael J Fox, Natalie Portman. Happy deathday to Charles Dickens.

Let's get on with the festivities.






June 8, 2012

Comparisons

The Shenandoah playlistthat I've been working on is largely complete. It exists, however, in three separate forms.

First there's the new hotness, rdio. Do me a favor and check to see if the playlist is playable without an rdio account.



There's the 8Tracks version...




...and there's the YouTube version...



Now, as to a comparison...
  • YouTube is easy and visual and, in this case, very much limited. YouTube doesn't have nearly as many versions of "Shenandoah" as I would want it to have, and it's missing a number of my favorite versions. Some of the visuals are also fairly pointless as they're just uploads of songs over still images. Meh...
  • 8Tracks allowed me to upload any versions that I had saved on my computer. There is a limit of no more than two songs by any one artist or from any one album, but those are easily circumvented if you want to. Plus the time to upload this playlist was about twenty minutes in the background while I did other things on the computer. 
  • Rdio had a massive selection, and dropping songs onto the playlist was easy as pie. But, it's a pay service. Thankfully the local library is paying for it for now.

June 7, 2012

Vonne Gut Reactions: Slaughterhouse Five, or the Children's Crusade

And here we are...

The master's masterwork...the biggest ball in the canon...Slaughterhouse Five, or the children's crusade.

This is the Vonnegut that I started with back in senior AP English, the first work from Vonnegut that I'd ever read. It's the book that I've read more frequently than any other, having picked it up every few years since 1991. When people ask me what my favorite book is, this is the one that I typically put forth as my choice.

This is also the book via which most people are introduced to Vonnegut, and that tends to put a lot of people off because it's a very interesting book being neither straight forward war novel nor science fiction exploration. The combination of the two, however, makes for a phenomenal and gorgeous exploration of both.

I am thrilled to have reread that novel after reading Vonnegut's other works because I found lots of interesting things that I'd never noticed before because I didn't know his earlier works.
  • The opening chapter is as direct and open a work as we've seen from Vonnegut thus far. This is the only time when he has put himself into his works without pretense of surrogate, of Kilgore Trout or some other charade that the character wasn't Vonnegut.
  • On page 9 (of the edition shown above - all pages will reference that edition, whichever it happens to be because it's the edition that my students read each year in one of our Junior-year English classes and the one that our school library has and which I read because I'd loaned my copy to Calen a couple of years back) Vonnegut tells of his time as a newspaper man reporting on the death of a man at the hands of a runaway elevator. Vonnegut glosses over the grisly details but remembers exactly that his copywriter was eating a 3 Musketeers Bar. Here, as he does quite often throughout the book, Vonnegut's focus isn't on the horrible details of the events that he saw but rather on the small, often trivial details that flood back to his memory around those events. He will, throughout this book that is tangentially about the bombing of Dresden, treat war in the same way, glossing of the worst details and focusing instead on something that was noticed in passing while the atrocities were committed.
  • In the same chapter, Vonnegut visits an old war buddy of his and finds the buddy's wife angry at Vonnegut.
    Then she turned to me, let me see how angry she was, and that the anger was for me. She had been talking to herself, so what she said was a fragment of a much larger conversation. "You were just babies then!" she said.

    "What?" I said.

    "You were just babies in the war - like the ones upstairs!"

    I nodded that this was true. We had been foolish virgins in the war, right at the end of childhood.

    "But you're not going to write it that way, are you." This wasn't a question. It was an accusation.

    "I - I don't know," I said.

    "Well, I know," she said. "You'll pretend you were men instead of babies, and you'll be played in the movies by Frank Sinatra or John Wayne or some of those other glamorous, war-loving, dirty old men. And was will look just wonderful, so we'll have a lot more of them. And they'll be fought by babies like the babies upstairs."

    So then I understood. It was war that made her so angry. She didn't want her babies or anybody else's babies killed in wars. And she thought wars were partly encourage by books and movies.

    ...

    "I tell you what," I said, "I'll call it 'The Children's Crusade.' "
    ...and he did. (page 14)
  • While our protagonist, Billy Pilgrim, is waiting to be loaded onto a boxcar as a German prisoner of war, he meets Wild Bob whose invitation to visit him if ever Billy is in Cody, Wyoming we will hear throughout the book. At this point, Vonnegut firmly places himself in the story, not as narrator, not as character, but rather as background soldier. "I was there. So was my old war buddy, Bernard V. O'Hare." (page 67)
  • Vonnegut reappears in a few pages, calling up Billy Pilgrim in the middle of the night, his breath smelling of mustard gas and roses through the phone. (page 73)
  • Billy questions the Tralfamadorians (they're back again), asking 'why me?' when he is abducted. Vonnegut has the aliens answer with equally senseless questions 'Why you? Why us? Why anything? ... The is no why?"

    This very much matches Vonnegut's position on destiny and reason throughout his books that I've read so far. It is a major theme in this novel as things happen because they do, 'and so it goes.' The Tralfamadorians view their lives, their world in this fashion, seeing the future, the past, the present all as having already happened and looking for no reasons or ways to change those events. What is simply is. What will be already is, as well. 'And so it goes.' (page 77)

    This philosophy is echoed by the German guard when asked the same question, 'Vy you? Vy anybody?' (page 93)
  • In Billy's morphine dream he dreams of giraffes with horns like doorknobs, and the narrators asks why? He receives no answer. Neither our lives nor our dreams respond to logic or searches for reason. (page 99)
  • Eliot Rosewater makes an appearance in the book, a fellow mental patient beside Billy. The universe of Vonnegut's books begins to tighten together, something that becomes tighter still in the next book I'll be reading (and that I've read before), Breakfast of Champions. (page 100)
  • An English colonel, a German prisoner of war, speaks to Edgar Derby, an American officer. The colonel says 'You know - we've had to imagine the war here, and we have imagined that it was being fought by aging men like ourselves. We had forgotten that wars were fought by babies. When I saw those freshly shaved face, it was a shock. 'My God, my God -' I said to myself, 'It's the Children's Crusade.' "

    Again, echoing Vonnegut's recurring theme of wars being fought by babies. (page 106)
  • In one of the few appearances in this novel, Vonnegut's anti-religious stance is related by the Kilgore Trout in his novel The Gospel from Outer Space:
    He supposed that the intent of the Gospels was to teach people, among other things, to be merciful, even to the lowest of the low.

    But the Gospels actually taught this:

    Before you kill somebody, make absolutely sure he isn't well connected. So it goes.

    The flaw in the Christ stories, said the visitor from outer space, was that Christ, who didn't look like much, was actually the Son of the Most Powerful Being in the Universe. Readers understood that, so when they came to the crucifixion, they naturally thought, and Rosewater read out loud again:

    Oh, boy - they sure picked the wrong guy to lynch that time!And that thought had a brother: "There are right people to lynch." Who? People not well connected. So it goes. (page 108)
  • The Tralfamadorians choose not to dwell on the same times in their lives, focusing on and living in the happy times instead. Does this echo Vonnegut's reluctance, the long time it took him to write his Dresden novel? (page 117)
  • Lance Rumfoors and his bride, the former Cynthia Landry, pass by the window of Billy's honeymoon suite. They aren't the Rumfoords of Sirens of Titan, but they are clearly part of the same family. (page 120)
  • Howard W Campbell, the main figure of Mother Night, is a strong presence here as a German soldier reads from Campbell's monograph about the poor spirit of the American soldier and again when he appears in Dresden recruiting American soldiers for his Free American Corps to fight for the Germans against the Russians. Vonnegut even tells us that Campbell would eventually hang himself while on trial as a war criminal. Again, Vonnegut's universe comes together more tightly. (pages 129 & 163)
  • In Campbell's monograph he tells of the wealthy being embarrassed by the poor in America, of the American soldiers being dressed as poor, adding to their lack of dignity when fighting. This returns to another of Vonnegut's recurring theme of the divide between poor and wealthy in America. Campbell relates as myth the American espousal that it is easy for a poor person to work hard and become wealthy, meaning that any poor person must be a failure if they remain poor. (page 130)
  • In the final chapter, Vonnegut returns to us directly and muses on death, one of the recurring themes of Slaughterhouse Five:
    Robert Kennedy, whose summer house is eight miles from the home I live in all year round, was shot two nights ago. He died last night. So it goes.

    Martin Luther King was shot a month ago. He died, too. So it goes.

    And every day my Government gives me a count of corpses created by military science in Vietnam. So it goes.
    Edgar Derby is shot for no reason at all, certainly nothing that merited killing when reflected on the actions of World War II. Billy's fellow corpse miner rips his insides to shreds and dies in the last days of the war. Even Billy walks openly to his death.

    So it goes.
This is Vonnegut's most distilled treatise on the pointlessness of life and of death and particularly of war, the fact that our actions have repercussions but that those repercussions aren't all that important in the long run because the world will keep turning no matter what we do, no matter who live or dies.

Vonnegut has previously mused that trying to stop wars is like trying to stop the wind.

Under a heavier hand, thoughts like these could lead to abject hopelessness, but Vonnegut's tone is far lighter. Even though there is no rhyme or reason to the world, we should still be kind and loving to each other for as long as we can be. As Eliot Rosewater related, "There's only one rule that I know of, babies—God damn it, you've got to be kind."

As Vonnegut writes here, "And even if the wars didn't keep coming like glaciers, there would still be plain old death."

--------

I continue to be on the lookout for a female character in Vonnegut's works. Here we have three women: Billy's wife, Valencia; Billy's daughter, Lily; and Billy's paramour on Tralfamadore, Montana Wildhack. None of the three are anything more than one-dimensional companions with whom Billy passively spends his time when not unstuck in time.

-------

This is the finest of Vonnegut's works so far, and it is a brilliant novel and musing on life, death, and war. I'm glad I reread it.

-------

I am always amazed that people look to ban this book. Rarely has there ever been a better message in a book than that no matter how hopeless and pointless the world may appear, we should be kind to each other and look at the best parts of our lives.

June 6, 2012

Gimme a little something...

...if you want me to give you my business.

This past week I got a simple postcard advertisement in the mail for Portable Miniature Golf.

The card was addressed to resident, so it appears that I'm not on any miniature-golf-specific mailing list, or at least that this advertisement didn't come from such a mailing list...which kind of surprises me, honestly.

The postcard, however, isn't today's story. Today's story is the website that the postacrd lead me to. Here's a screencap...


The top header has three rotating images - the one shown, a closeup of a kid trying to blow a golf ball into the hole, and a closeup of the green and hole with no context. So those other photos don't give us any more information than does the rest of the page.

I like the general layout of the page, particularly the simple background imagery. The black, green, and yellow makes for an attractive enough presentation, and the use of the light grey in the bottom right draws the eye to the pricing request form, the real meat of the page.

In general, there's not much else on the page, however, and that bugs me a little. I want to see the quality of the hole construction. I want to see if the various holes have any bumpers, any obstacles - like the one we maybe see in the header picture on the right. I want to see people standing next to the course so I can see what a 12' long hole two looks like. I want to see the pencils, scorecards, balls[,] & putters that they say they provide.

I guess they're assuming people don't want to know that stuff, that they assume people will sign up having not seen the holes in any detail. I'm hoping their business model is working, but the lack of detail is driving me nuts. Gimme some sort of photo album of people at the church festivals, corporate events, and the birthday parties. Lemme see that you've put a little work into making the hole frames sturdy. Show me that your carpet is nice, clean, unworn, and evenly, firmly glued down.

Of course I'm crabbing about their website with absolutely no intention of ever being one of their customers unless I hit the lottery.

June 5, 2012

A small? No...A large? No...

How about the media?

Chronicle - The trailer was engaging (and ubiquitous during the NCAA tourney) enough that I've been wanting to see this since I saw the first previews. Simple enough idea here: three teen boys get superpowers (telekinesis pretty much, but such that they learn to fly and to protect themselves via forcefields)...things go very right...then very wrong.

The film is told primarily through the lens of the main character who's filming his life to protect himself from his drunk, physically abusive father and to capture his mother's last few months of life. Here are there footage switches to a fellow student who's filming her life for her video blog or security camera or police cruiser footage as the boys pass by a store. This leads a strong cinéma vérité/ found footage vibe to the story making it seem a little grittier but allowing the surprisingly impressive special effects to stand out even more than if the film were glossier, prettier.

This isn't low budget in the ways that Clerks was with poor film quality being purely a product of the lack of filmmaker funds. This is low budget that doesn't feel low budget, that realism serves the story and draws us easily into the lives of these young men who suddenly find themselves with more power than they had ever imagined and than they know what to do with. It's a side of super heroism that is rarely handled in comic books. Heroes find their powers and suddenly do the right thing. Bad guys find their powers and do the wrong. These boys are granted powers - the mechanism is never explained with anything more than handwaving, it happens because it needs to happen for the story - and stumble their way along causing low-grade mischief, helping a few people, but mostly entertaining themselves.

The choices they make are made because they're teenage boys. They lash out when they're angry. They try to do noble things and come up with rules about their collective powers, but they don't think much through. These are teenagers without fully developed frontal cortexes. They are action often divorced from consideration of consequence, and that's why it doesn't always work out.

The plan to become popular doesn't work.

The plan to fly to Tibet and gain enlightenment doesn't work.

The solution to the abusive father and the dying mother doesn't work.

The movie does work.

Admittedly the ending is a bit predictable and a little too quick, but it's interesting and engaging to get there, particularly for anyone who works with teenagers or wondered why every superhero or villain was black and white, good or bad. These are greys and interesting ones at that.

Primal Fear - I've been impressed with Edward Norton's career and hadn't seen this film, his screen debut. It's summer, so I took a couple of hours to see his opening salvo to the screen.

Norton here plays an alter boy accused of killing an archbishop, found running from the scene with blood covering him. Richard Gere, prototypical smooth-talking, high-powered, ambulance-chasing lawyer, takes on the case pro bono because...well...because he needs to for the movie to exist. Gere's character searches for any way to prevent the alter boy from being given the death penalty, willing to do anything - even to further sully his far from pristine soul - to save the life of this one innocent.

In the course of Gere's investigation and defense, he finds that Norton's alter boy has a second person inside his head who protects himself from the world, a second personality that comes out in times of stress. The film builds, predictably enough, to a courtroom climax - unrealistic, of course, but thoroughly cinematic - allowing Gere to save his client's life.

Then comes the reveal, and I won't give away that revelation because to do so would change how you view the movie, and while the bulk of the film is straight forward enough and follows a fairly traditional movie plot arc, the performances by Gere and Norton are strong enough to redeem the plot and the too-tidy, too-on-the-nose twist.

Norton shines here as does Gere. The rest of the cast does admirable support with Laura Linney's prosecutor in over her head doing a yeoman's job allowing Gere to play off of and thoroughly outclass her played-straight character.

The value in here is in the performances of the two leads. They're excellent, and the rest of the film allows them to be so.

Crazy Stupid Love - Another twist...one I actually didn't see coming this time. (I'd heard about the twist in Primal Fear before seeing the film.)

This film heads so easily and naturally toward every romantic comedy convention that it even mocks its natural inclinations with Steve Carell at one point deadpanning 'how cliche' when the skies open up with rain, drenching him when he's at one of his many emotional low points in this film. Luckily, the film turns away from every predictable destination into much more interesting territory and making for a surprisingly and pleasantly engaging film.

It helps, of course, that the cast is absolutely top notch and at the height of their powers here. Julianne Moore and Steve Carell play the married couple who have hit a rough patch, having forgotten how to cherish each other and dissolving into divorce when Moore dallies and surprises Carell's character with a request for divorce over dessert. Ryan Gosling is at his Ryan Gosling-est, getting to play the phenomenally charming, smooth, vapid lothario who can charm the cocktail dress off of any woman at the bar that he and Carell frequent, offering his teachings to Carell because he is tired of hearing Carell's sad sack story for two straight days at 'his' bar. Gosling, however, also gets to play the good man once he finds a woman he actually cares for, who he isn't willing to simply bed and forget, who throws him fully into the deep end of a world with which he is entirely unfamiliar but not, thankfully entirely unprepared. Emma Stone is brilliantly funny and charming as the predictably Gosling-turning role. Marisa Tomei makes the most of her bit part, returning twice to great comedic value after her initial introduction. Kevin Bacon, sadly, is largely wasted in a brief supporting role with which he makes a charming nothing, but that may be more a result of the fact that having any more interesting characters to develop would have sold the main four short.

Those main four, though, are the heart of the film and are thoroughly charismatic, engaging, and richly developed. They are anything but two-dimensional stereotypes, and they success and failures, confidence and hopelessness make for a pleasantly enjoyable romantic comedy that wears its heart on its sleeve the whole time and isn't ashamed of it or saccharine about it.

Worth seeing...

Be warned, however, that there's a bothersome flaw in the resolution of the tertiary love triangle involving the divorcing couple's babysitter. It doesn't ruin the film by any means, but it clearly needed to be given another once over from a good editor before it hit the big screen.



Blue Beetle - I haven't read anything involving Ryan Choi's The Atom, nor had I read anything involving Jaime Reyes's Blue Beetle. When DC killed Choi and Reyes, however, I complained in spite of my lack of having read the series.


I rectified that by reading the six collected editions of the pre-new-52 Blue Beetle series: Shellshocked, Road Tip, Reach for the Stars, End Game, Boundaries, and Black and Blue so that I at least knew if the series should have been cancelled or not.

Turns out that this was a series that was a bit slow to start, struggling to introduce lots of characters and flitter around in the magic or science or space realms of the DC universe - all of which involve very different character sets and struggle when overlapped. As the initial story arc wrapped up with Jaime reaching a stalemate with La Dama and finding himself finally content with taking on the role of protector of El Paso, the series found itself on strong footing with a rich cast of supporting characters - especially Jaime's friends Paco and Brenda as well as his family and girlfriend, Traci Thirteen.

Then things went a bit off the rails with Jaime having to fight the aliens who created his power-granting scarab as they tried to take over the entire planet. The huge scope - and the subsequent change in writers to Matt Sturges - undid much of the work that initial writers, Giffen and Rogers, had done in creating a thoroughly but unstereotypically Hispanic hero. From there, things got worse with the series being cancelled (in spite of a satisfying series conclusion) and Beetle being shuffled off to a supporting feature at the back of Booster Gold's series.

The initial twenty-some issues (through Road Trip especially and all the way to End Game to a lesser extent) is worth reading. The last two collected volumes - Black and Blue and Boundaries - are of far lesser quality.

So, should Beetle have been cancelled? I can't say for certain. There were stories here to be told, and Jaime Reyes was a character who had enough good that his stories were worth telling. His value as a Hispanic hero - complete with an issue told almost entirely in Spanish - is certainly worth something in terms of DC's future and attempts to bring in new readers. In the end, however, I can't say for certain without seeing the sales figures for the Blue Beetle issues. A short-term loss might have been a long-term gain in DC's eyes, but if that short-term loss is too big, it might not be worth carrying on the books.

June 4, 2012

Do you Cuusoo?



Cuusoo is a website from the Lego group that lets people post their creations, drum up support, and possibly get their set made as an official Lego release once they get 10,000 supporters.

So far eight sets have reached the 10,000 supporter hurdle. Three are in the process of being reviewed by the Lego designers for final approval. Two were rejected outright (Shaun of the Dead's Winchester pub and Firefly's Serenity ship) because of their thematic elements that weren't viewed as appropriate for Lego's younger audience. Three have been produced, one - Minecraft blocks - of which is available for purchase in the US right now.

I'm supporting a few Cuusoo sets right now:
I've avoided some of the more popular sets - dark bucket, My Little Pony, sandcrawler, Zelda, Western modular town - because either they're going to be ridiculously expensive (100 Star Wars figures at ~$3 per figure?), are in themes that don't interest me, or are unlikely to get licensing approval. Instead, I'm focusing on unlicensed creations (all but Hogwarts and Nintendo) and ones that I would actually buy - in particular the skeleton and Lego Park sets.

Can you find anything of Cuusoo that you think deserves my support? What's your favorite Cuusoo creation?

Update: A quick primer

The AV Club's Primer series continues to impress. I really like the format of essential, intermediate, advanced, and demerits of each artist's career. I've said it before, and here are some highlight posts added since I said it last:

June 3, 2012

Odds and sods

Three things I want to mention...
  • It's killing me to decide whether I'm rooting for or against Novak Djokovic. The three outcomes that are most likely at Roland Garros..
    • Rafael Nadal wins, giving him seven titles, more than any other player in the Open era. I don't want this to happen. I don't find Nadal's tennis pretty to watch. It's brutal and no fun....maybe 55% chance of this outcome.
    • Novak Djokovic wins, making him only the second man in the Open era to hold all four grand slam titles. I'm okay with this happening. This is my second choice outcome. Maybe 35% chance of this outcome.
    • Roger Federer wins, adding one to his record total, making him the second-oldest man to win a Grand Slam title in the Open era. This is easily the outcome that I'm desperately hoping for but that is by far the least likely of the three.  Maybe 5% chance of this outcome.
    • When I saw that Djokovic went down two sets to none to start today's match against Andreas Seppi, I was initially giddy because I know a Djokovic loss makes it much more likely that Federer will make the finals because he has to meet Djokovic in the semis otherwise, but it also makes it much more likely that Nadal will win the title, something I really don't want to watch next Sunday morning.
  • I really like following the NCAA D1 baseball tourney scores. Go Vandy...Go Appalachain St...Go Dallas Baptist...Go Creighton...Go St John's...Go Stony Brook
  • In case you - like I - were curious about who gets to play in the Olympic tennis events, here are the qualifying details - including why a player from Liechtenstein will be playing and how the qualifications will change for at least the women for the 2016.

June 2, 2012

Pain is just weakness leaving the body

Happy Roland Garros, everybody...

Update: After Saturday, the top eight men's seeds are all in the round of 16 meaning we could have a perfect quarterfinals. Fingers are crossed.

Happy summer...





June 1, 2012

Gifts for a ChemGuy

I'm doing everything I can not to run out and buy all the Lego collectible minifigs that I can from the local stores - Wal-Mart, Meijer, wherever. See, I screwed up and bought some of the series 5 minifigs when Meijer put them in the $1.50 clearance rack. I blind bought a bunch of the figures and quickly had twelve of the sixteen figures (plus extras of most of the ones I did get).

I, however, have a disease. My name is ChemGuy, and I'm a completist.

See, I had twelve of the sixteen, but I didn't have all sixteen. That's four that were floating around out there that weren't a part of my collection. So I went back and grabbed a few more at the clearance price but didn't get any of the four I needed.

So I learned and worked a little harder, figuring out how to identify each of the figures by feel through the still-sealed, opaque bags. I picked up a few that I wanted more of and found the four I had been missing. By feeling through the bags, I hit six of seven on what I thought was in the bag, and I finished the collection...of series 5, anyway.

Which is a dangerous place to be because there are seven series, and I've only completed one of the seven series - so far.

I'm going to try and be strong, however. I'm going to try not to buy any more collectible minifigs and just remain with one complete set and a few multiples from that set.


If, however, you wanted to pick a little something up for me - or wanted to set my completist nature into a tizzy, here are my favorite non-series-5 collectable minifigs...



From series 1...

From series 2...


From series 3...
From series 4...
From series 6...

Form series 7...





May 31, 2012

Twisted Sifter

I put a little work in on my blog. Yeah, it's work that I enjoy, but it's a labor of love.

Some folks, however, put in way more work on their blog. Of course, they just might be trying to make some money out of their little production. Take, for example, the Twisted Sifter blog, which seems like it would take a whole lot of work to put together.

Impressive confluences around the world...


15 incredible cloud formations...


30 chilling photos of natural hazards


Forging a ring from a meteorite...


The most epic group photos you will see today...


And the ever gorgeous and intriguing picture of the day...(here's one from this past weekend)...


May 30, 2012

Can't tell the truth in here



I've mentioned A House of Lies before, but only within the realm of the author's search for the most 90's movie of all time (he sadly hasn't reviewed New Jack City yet, which is a crime).

Turns out that the entire blog, while a little sporadic, is outstandingly well written. Check out these great, recent posts...
It's all good stuff. I'm adding it to my RSS feed.

May 29, 2012

They're back...



It's been too long, but thankfully Old Jews Telling Jokes has returned.

Hilarious stuff, more of which is after the jump...some of them are slightly...