Showing posts with label money. Show all posts
Showing posts with label money. Show all posts

July 23, 2015

Robert Downey, Jr's paycheck

Today I'm providing just a few facts about what Robert Downey, Jr is paid for the Marvel movies:
  • The Avengers - $50 million
  • Iron Man 3 - $75 million
  • Avengers: Age of Ultron - $80 million
  • Captain America; Civil War - $80 million
My source: Uproxx (whose sources are Forbes, IGN, CBM, and Variety)

Plus, he has the big, giant A from the side of the mythical Stark Tower in his house.

He really is Tony Stark, isn't he?


July 22, 2015

Freemium = 'not really'



I've been playing QuizUp, a freemium game, for a year and a half now. It's a free app, but it does allow in-app purchases of 'experience point' multipliers, a buck to double your experience points (or whatever the game calls them) for ten minutes, a couple more bucks to double the experience for half an hour or an hour. I have yet to pay a single penny through the game, but I know that freemium games are wildly profitable - Clash of Clans had more than $1.8 BILLION in revenue in 2014.

Thankfully, South Park laid it all out...



This last one, I warn you, is more than a little NSFW.


November 21, 2012

Update: Update: Realignment

A quick update on my earlier comments about realignment...

Really?

Maryland and Rutgers?

Seriously?

I know it's all about money, but sheesh...are we finally done, or is Kansas or North Carolina next for the Big Ten Twelve Fourteen?

November 14, 2012

Update: The Stephen Colbert SuperPAC confusion



Man, I do not understand how the courts and Congress could've set this all up...

And, seriously, Colbert Super PAC SHHH really has over $800,000 left?

Good lord...

October 8, 2012

Today's quote...

PhotobucketFrom the Friday News Round-Up on The Diane Rehm Show this past Friday...
One interesting statistic about this recovery... If you have a bachelor's degree right now in America, your unemployment rate is 4.1%. If you have a high school diploma, it's 8.7[%]. If you don't, it's 11.3[%].  The relationship in our economy, in a globalized, competitive economy between education achievement and job placement has never been tighter. ~ Major Garrett, National Journal (4:30 in at link above)
If ever there was a strong piece of evidence that education should be pursued...

August 8, 2012

An accident paid for

Couple of weeks ago the Court of Claims of Ohio approved a $600,000 settlement for a Cincinnati couple whose daughter was burned when a couple of UC employees (professors? grad students? secretaries? - the article doesn't say) were doing a demonstration that went wrong. Apparently the ethanol caught fire and exploded, resulting in the girl getting second and third degree burns on her arms, legs, and face.

I try to pay attention to lab accidents so I know what not to do in my classroom. I need to know more about this one because I burn ethanol in my classroom all the time. I'm curious as to what went wrong here because I've never had a problem with ethanol. Methanol is bad stuff, but ethanol hasn't been a problem that I've known.

April 5, 2012

My long search is over...

Government transparency of the day...thank you TheDailyWh.at and the White House...

I've been looking for a breakdown of what the government spends for a while now, and finally, it's available...


November 29, 2011

Occupy IDTMI



I'm going to have to straight up open by saying that I don't understand the Occupy Wall Street (et al) protests.

Actually, let me back up a little bit.

Whenever the question of free speech vs governmental restrictions comes up, I side with free speech. I think we should be able to say pretty much anything we want to say, anywhere, anytime - unless it can be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that allowing such would cause direct and immediate harm to somebody. We can debate the exact details all over the place, but I'll generally err on the side of allowing free speech. Just thought you should know that.

Pursuant to that position, I'm fully supportive of people's rights to protest. If you're bothered by your local school board's policies, show up at the meeting and have your say. If you're worried that your city is discriminating, call the media and let 'em film your signs. If you think the federal government is turning control of the country over to some world government via secret codes on the back of the highway signs, write to the newspaper and set yourself ablaze.

I may not join you, but I'll defend your rights to say your piece to the ends of the Earth.

That being said, unless you have a specific issue and a solution, I may just ask you what you're hoping to accomplish here, and that's where I am with Occupy Wall Street. I just don't get what the protesters are hoping to accomplish.

I think we can all agree that there is a gigantic economic disparity in our country. The rich are getting richer on the backs of the poor and the middle class. We're in the middle of an economic downturn/recession that's as bad as anything we've had since the late 1970's (or longer depending on what measures you trust). Or maybe we're barely coming out of it - very...slowly. The recession was caused by the mistakes made by large investment banks that didn't seem to suffer too much in the (so far) long run.

And the middle class is getting killed. Jobs are being lost. Homes are being lost. Retirement savings are being lost.

I get the anger. I understand the frustration. I just don't see the way out or what the Occupy Wall Street protesters are hoping to change. Rather, I don't get how the Occupy Wall Street protesters are hoping to turn their Occupy-ing into change.

How are they hoping that camping out, Occupying Everywhere, chanting, cheering, getting arrested, beaten, and trampled is going to lead to this change? And just what change do they want to see happen?

Do they want taxes raised on the rich job creators?

Do they want more regulations on investment banks?

Do they want more jobs?

Do they want more governmental support of unions?

Do they want to end subsidies to oil companies?

What's the specific goal that can be accomplished to make the protesters happy? If their goal is a more equitable distribution of wealth, I'm afraid they're going to be Occupying through a whole lot of long, cold winters.


...

That being said, the treatment that the protesters have received - and possibly that they have given back to law enforcement in some cases - has been deplorable. The video above shows a peaceful protest at UC Davis which was broken up by the infamous (and meme-inspiring) pepper-spraying John Pike. We've seen similar incidents in lots of other cities - including Portland, shown to the right - many of which have lead to extremely violent showdowns between protesters and law enforcement - most noticeably in Oakland.

I am happy to say that all reports here in the Queen City have been that police have done their jobs while being respectful of the protesters. There have been arrests and park-clearings, but there hasn't been violence.

November 21, 2011

Just for one of you...

Here's the link to This American Life's episode about money being fiction. It's worth a listen.

And just to fill the space so this is sort of a real update...

Um, here's a link to a recent, fun Family Guy episode in which Brian and Stewie travel to the past to find Brian's tennis ball.

And a nicely done Google music commercial...

September 20, 2011

The Stephen Colbert SuperPAC confusion

Man, I just do not get the whole Stephen Colbert Super PAC thing.



I got that it was initially funny because Colbert was making fun of the Supreme Court decision that corporations could spend unlimited money on political campaigns.

Heck, I even got it that Colbert took his request to create a Super PAC to the Federal Election Commission and made a media circus of the event.
           
The Colbert ReportMon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
Colbert Super PAC - The Heroes Respond
www.colbertnation.com
Colbert Report Full EpisodesPolitical Humor & Satire BlogVideo Archive

What I don't get is where the gag is going now.

I understand that Stephen Colbert is not the character he plays on television. From everything I understand about the man, I get that he leans left and doesn't agree with the conservative ideology typical of Fox News, Sarah Palin, Rick Perry, and probably even Mitt Romney. I think I generally agree with his political leanings, but because he's so good at staying in character, it's tough for me to always tell. He doesn't often reveal the man behind the suit.

What I don't get now, however, is what Colbert plans to do with all the money that he's collecting via his Super PAC. He's made a couple of commercials that aired in Iowa around the Straw Poll time, but the ads just seemed to be ridiculous pastiches of the typical conservative-leaning political ads. They didn't seem to be doing anything other than mocking the already-airing conservative ads.


I don't understand what Colbert is trying to accomplish. Is he just taking money so that he can show his jokes to a wider audience, to saturate the airwaves beyond his Comedy Central time slot? Is he going to eventually endorse an actual candidate in the 2012 election or is he going to keep airing ads mocking the candidates that he doesn't like (but mocking them in ways that I'm not sure every conservative voter would really know is mocking.)

I'm not sure I'm enjoying the Super PAC because it starts to blur the line between the real election and the coverage of the election. I know Colbert is far from a true, traditional newsman, but at what point does the mocking of an election begin to damage the respect that we have for the elected?


Cinéma vérité can go too far, and I fear that Colbert's cinema may just do that.

There's been a lot of press coverage of the Super PAC - NYTimes, NPR, Colbert Report, NPR again. I think in the end, I like the Daily Illini's take on the Super PAC:
The slanted media tells viewers about the madness of the circus. Colbert put viewers in the show. Now they know how serious, and dangerous, the fun and games really are. That is as straight as news gets.

September 6, 2011

Comics are expensive

Sometimes I just love the internet. Either I get to see photos of something that I never would have been able to experience otherwise or somebody posts a piece of fascinating research that would never have seen the light of day were it not for his/her website.

Today's post points out an example of the second of these: the research thing.

The past couple of decades have seen comic book take a turn for the less financially successful with DC and Marvel losing readership in droves. The causes of this have been debated: too much continuity, increasingly crowded media landscape, the decline of the newsstand, the growth of the direct market, digital comics, the speculators crash in the 1990s, the ceasing of virgin sacrifices to get that vivid read of Superman's cape.

In a post on ComicsAuthority, Von Allen explores a cause that I haven't seen anyone consider yet: the fact that comics are too expensive. Von Allen spreadsheeted the historical cost of comic books per page versus minimum wage and found that the average comic book...
  • in the late 1930's cost 0.6% of weekly minimum wage
  • in the late 1960's cost 0.2% of weekly minimum wage
  • in the mid-late 2000's cost 1.4% of weekly minimum wage
Sure, things are more expensive now. We all know it. Von Allen anticipates this criticism by pointing out that movie tickets, during the 1969-current time period, have risen from 2.5% of weekly minimum wage to 3.0% of weekly minimum wage, an increase of 20% instead of comics' increase of 600%.


Internet...research...statistics...comic books...how could anything be more perfect?

June 30, 2011

This is why the NBA owners deserve no sympathy

The NBA is headed toward a lockout, the kind of lockout that the NFL is already deep into.

According to some folks who all know more about the NBA than I do, this could be a protracted lockout.

At the heart of the matter is, of course, money. They players want more of it, and the owners do, too.

But all I can see is exceedingly stupid stories like this one: The Trail Blazers have offered former No. 1 draft pick Greg Oden an $8.8 million qualifying offer to stay in Portland.

If you don't know who Greg Oden is, go ahead and click through that link to see his stats. He's played one season worth of games - 82 games exactly - in his four professional seasons. He has earned nearly $22 million dollars in those four years.

I get that injuries are a part of the game and the risks that you take when you sign a player to a long-term contract, but stop throwing good money after bad and offering Oden a raise at this point. He is injured. He is going to be injured or injury-prone his whole career.

Don't give him a raise.

I have no sympathy for anybody in professional sports.

Or for any sports fan who bitches about professional sports and the money involved. If you we want the madness to end, you we have to stop paying attention, have to stop giving any money to these already far too wealthy people (owners AND players).

May 18, 2011

Soon to be a Numbskull


Had a meet and great with this guy on Monday night who apparently created/patented Numbskull: The SAT Prep Game. He had a little offer for me (and for some other teachers, admittedly.)

Seems that the board game's fortunes took a turn for the worse when the SAT was redesigned a few years back. The company licensing the board game decided not to redesign it for the new SAT and let the license lapse.

So Michael Bergman (the aforementioned this guy) took back the license and turned the thing into a Facebook app. You can check the whole, not-terribly-sordid history here. Currently the app has a few hundred SAT/ACT prep questions in verbal and math skills and offers students a chance to do college admissions test prep for free rather than paying up to $1000 for a Kaplan or similar course or even buying a bulky, old-school prep book.

Where I come in is that the app has gotten some good press and is now in need of greater content to move the app forward. Turns out they need some teachers to write questions...and they're willing to pay.

So it looks like I have a little something to do this summer.

My questions probably won't be online until August or so, but feel free to check out the app.

April 6, 2011

Eatin' meatless on the cheap

I've mentioned to The Girl that I would like to occasionally eat a meatless meal, something that's more environmentally friendly than partaking of the awesomness of a thick, juicy, large-carbon-footprint strip steak. She's good to me, so she tries to accommodate my meal requests in as much as she feels like it. So, Monday and Tuesday were meatless meals.

Turns out that the economic footprint of the meals was already pretty frickin' small - about $1.50 for eight of these pupusas which made for two meals for each of us. We added a salad for a pretty healthy, cheap, meatless meal.

The source of the recipe is from Vegetarian Times's April/May, 2011 issue. I would link to the recipe, but their website stinks like tofu-fish...

Pupusas
Serves 8
  •  4 cups masa harina, such as Maseca
  • 2 tsp. ground cumin
  • 1 tsp. baking powder
  • 2 tsp. salt
  • 1/2 cup vegetarian refried black beans
  • 1/2 cup crumbled Cotija cheese
  • 8 tsp. vegetable oil
  1. Combine masa harina, cumin, baking powder, and salt in bowl.
  2. Stir in 2 cups warm water, adding more, if needed, to form soft dough.
  3. Cover, and let stand 30 minutes.
  4. Line baking sheet with wax paper. Roll dough into 16 balls. Make indentations in centers; fill 8 balls with 1 Tbs. refried beans. Fill remaining 8 balls with 1 Tbs. cheese. Fold edges over fillings and roll into balls once more. Press into 4-inch disks. Place on prepared baking sheet.
  5. Heat 2 tsp. oil in skillet over medium-high heat. Add 4 pupusas at a time to skillet; cook 5-6 minutes, turning once.
The Girl does cotton to refried beans, so she just mashed up some black beans that she'd made earlier in the day. She also didn't do some with cheese and some with beans. They just got mixed into one filling and used in every pupusa.

The beans, themselves, are also dirt cheap and phenomenally tasty.

Black beans
makes a crapload
  • ~8 cups water
  • 2 lbs black beans
  • onion, finely diced
  • 2 jalapenos
  • dried chili peppers
  • 2 tsp. salt
  1. Add all ingredients but salt to pot. Bring to boil; simmer for 1 hour. Do not stir.
  2. Add in salt; stir gently. Simmer 1 hour.
The beans make for a great side dish (especially with a little sour cream and salsa stirred in) or as an ingredient in burritos or enchiladas or whatever.

 Neither of the photos today are mine. The first is from Fat-Free Vegan, and the second is from The Wahsingtonian.

March 16, 2011

Senate Bill 5...bad for education...bad for Ohio...

Add "Kasich's proposed budget" to that headline...


I wonder why Fox 19 couldn't find a cameraman who knows how to take a level shot.

July 7, 2010

Free Slurpee Day

Free Slurpees at 7-11 this Sunday...'cause it's July 11th...7/11...

And the free Slurpees are 7.11 ounces big.

Get it?

Is there a 7-11 in the Cincinnati area?

June 13, 2010

Update: On a diet - financially and calorically

We're two weeks into the diet plan - not weighing myself yet, maybe that'll start this week - and I've made one adjustment: every time I get outside and get some exercise done (could be walking for a couple of hours around Chicago, could be mowing the lawn, could be grubbing the flower beds - as long as I'm sweating for a while, it counts) I earn an extra $1.

At this point, two weeks in, I have $21 in the bank.  Cheated three times, exercised four times (not great for two weeks, but it's a start).

And I'm dying to spend the $21 - new Mad About You DVDs on Amazon...new Kate Nash album...Lego collectible minifigs...Wii Sports Resorts...ice cream in all its myriad forms...

June 4, 2010

On a diet - financially and calorically

I want Wii Sports Resort, wanna go out and buy it tonight to celebrate the start of summer so I have some new game to conquer before mid-August rolls around.

But I'm not gonna do that, not yet anyway.

Instead, I'm gonna go on a little diet - a diet of finances and calories at the same time cause I clearly need to get both of those things under a bit of control.

I'm a pudgy boy who's willing to stop by the ice cream store once a week (or twice...maybe three or four times), and that tends to add up to a bunch of dollars spent and a few thousand extra calories dropped into my ever-expanding gullet.

It's not the meal-time eating that's a problem.  Yeah, I could have a slightly smaller bowl of Honey Nut Cheerios in the morning, and I could maybe not quite finish that entree, but what I really need to do is to cut out the mid-meal snacking, the impulse buying, the peanut butter malt and the cookie dough wizzard made with peanut butter ice cream.

So, here's what we're gonna do.

I'm setting aside $10 a week - probably not a concrete $10, I tend not to always have the exact cash around - but an electronic $10.  Every time I snack on anything unhealthy between meals - potato chips, can of coke, hamburger bun with butter and cherry-strawberry-kiwi jelly, that costs me $1.  If I stop to buy something, that comes out of the $10, too.

Every Sunday morning, that's a fresh $10 into the bank and an update sent to you folks on where my progress is financially.  If I start to get a little more serious about things, I'll start a poundage update here and there, but I'm gonna need to start exercising before I go to anything quite that extreme.

So far, I'm at $10 three or so days into experiment week one.

Once I get into the range of buying that new Wii game, I'll be a little happier.

July 27, 2009

Education and House Bill 1



So House Bill 1 (full text here) has passed and is pending on Governor Strickland's desk. The bill itself is massive - 3120 pages and 12MB as a pdf, something like 100,000 lines long - and I'll admit that I wouldn't have the foggiest idea where to start on reading through a document of that size. So I have, instead, turned to news agencies to offer me some sort of summary of the parts that particularly interest me - especially the educational parts.

I couldn't find much on The Enquirer's website in the way of a summary - I did find a page offering to show how much funding each district will lose or gain. (More on that later...)

So I headed to the Ohio Department of Education's budget page and found it about as equally helpful (though it was through that page that I found the link to the bill's full text).

And then onward to the Ohio Education Association's budget summary page where I found the above-posted YouTube video offering their summary of the bill. The OEA is, admittedly, thrilled with the budget's educational issues, so I'm not sure every conclusion that they reach is unbiased, but their summary leaves me with tons and tons of questions...
  • Wait, Jarod's Law is gone? When? Do I have to worry about it this year? Can I unlock my dish detergent today?
  • The OGT is gone, too? Again, when? When does the ACT come on board? Will there be a minimum ACT score needed for each student?
  • Why'd you get rid of the community service requirement?
  • What the heck is going to be involved in the senior project required for graduation? When will that come on board?
  • Really, all-day kindergarten? How're you going to fund that? Is it required for all students or just required to be offered by the district?
  • Just three calamity (snow) days in 10-11? How likely is year-round school at this point? If it comes, will teacher pay be increased?
  • When will these 'end of course examinations' be written? I thought the ODE didn't like the idea of breaking curriculum down by courses but rather just wanted to leave a group of standards for us to cover in the 7-10 grades and for us to arrange them as we chose. Does this mean a student won't get credit for bio (for example) unless they pass the end of course exam?
  • Do the teacher licensure changes affect me?
  • What's a 'non-civil service school district' in terms of the privatization of transportation? Will un-privatizing the transportation really save districts money?
  • What does it mean that teacher dismissal standards are now - over-ruling any collective bargaining agreements - 'good and just cause'?
  • What the heck standards will be applied to the 'semi-annual inspections' that will be replacing Jarod's Law? Will that be a county by county decision?
  • Yeah! to putting in some sort of accountability for charter schools.
  • What the heck is Eastern Gateway Community College?
That's for a start...

Nobody reading that happens to know any of those answers, do they?