This is largely coming together as a stream of consciousness. I don't know that I can be entirely rational about this...
The school shooting in Newtown, CT was a tragedy.
I certainly responded to it differently, though, than did many people, partially I'm sure because of my background.
I don't have children of my own. I don't teach at an elementary school, and in all honesty I don't always empathize well with people this distant from me. Our principal was in the hallway crying the afternoon of the shooting. I, on the other hand, was just thinking that these were people I didn't know. It was tragic for them to have died and horrific for them to have died this way, but these were people I didn't know.
Mass shootings like this both are and are not rare.
Since 1982 (
source and
source) there have been sixty-one mass shootings - at least four people killed by a single shooter - since 1982. Thirty years...sixty shootings...two a year.
That is both far too frequent to be ignored and far too rare to be of earth-shaking concern. Yes, we should legislate to reduce the chances of these events happening again, but we shouldn't focus on large-number killings to the exclusion of the far more frequent gun deaths that occur in drips and drabs - one or two at a time - all year long, every day of the year.
Mother Jones has done a great job of building a statistical profile of these sixty-plus events...
- 49 of the 62 listed shooters obtained their weapons legally
- 103 of the 145 total weapons used were semiautomatic handguns or assault weapons
- gun ownership - as a percentage of population - is declining while gun ownership - as a measure or total guns owned in the US - is rising...perhaps people are becoming more set in their gun-owning, gun-stockpiling ways
You can see an interactive map of all the events and a chronological listing of all the shooters and victims on
Mother Jones's website.
After the weekend PHS put out two large banners and invited our students to sign them, messages and condolences for the people of Sandy Hook and Newtown, banners to be mailed to Sandy Hook so that they could...
Because they need to...
I have absolutely no idea why Sandy Hook would want our banners, no idea what they are going to do with our banners or all the
snowflakes.
I remember reading about the impromptu memorial at the Oklahoma City bombing site, at the Murrah Federal Building. People of the community piled thousands of things...stuffed animals, photos, mementos, things...on the
chain link fence surrounding the bombing site. The items from that fence were - and as far as I can tell still are - "
cleaned, catalogued and used in some way that fits with the mission of the memorial."
With all that we've heard is being
sent to Newtown - stuffed animals, cards, wooden angels, snowflakes, giant signed banners - the people there will have to make a decision of their own: whether to keep everything, throw it all away, or pick and choose what matters and what doesn't.
They don't need our banners adding to that burden.
On a spectacularly good day in the United States, a dozen people are killed with guns.
- January 1 - 24 killed
- December 31 - 20 killed
- December 30 - 26 killed
- December 29 - 32 killed
- December 27 - 35 killed
- December 18 - 12 killed - the quietest day since Newtown, four days later
Slate has been tracking these deaths every day since Newtown. They show the deaths in icons, male and female, adult and child symbols.
This is where we should be focusing our policy attention. If we take the nineteen days of full data on that page as an average, we have 416 killings - an average of 22 a day. In a year, that's more than 8000 people a day killed with guns in the United States.
This is the bigger tragedy and the one that should be leading our legislative conversations.
Thanks, as is so often the case, to
NPR for pointing this post out.
The Journal News in Westchester and Rockland counties of New York published an
interactive map of every person possessing a legal pistol permit in those counties. It isn't necessarily a map of handguns or handgun owners, but it is permit holders.
The public reaction was interesting and almost universally negative.
The map is just information. It isn't condemnation. It isn't celebration, but people clearly saw it as one of those depending on what they brought to the information.
- How about a map of the editorial staff and publishers of Gannett and Journal News with names and addresses of their families...
- This is CRAZY!! why in the world would you post every licensed gun owner information?? What do you hope to accomplish by doing this. This is the type of thing you do for sex offenders not law abiding gun owners. What next? should i hang a flag outside my house that says I own a gun? I am canceling my subscription with your paper today!!!
- So should we start wearing yellow stars of david so the general public can be aware of who we are??
- We live in a free society. I am not at all ashamed of my ownership of a few handguns. While I understand the right of the local newspaper to post this, given to them by the first amendment of the very constitution that gives us legal license holders the right to possess the firearms they have published for all to see. While I totally agree (in principle) with their right to access this information, I think that the actions and reasoning behind this are not only questionable, but as a subscriber to their local newspaper, I think its irresponsible to post this information.
- Yeah, but where are the Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, Communists and Unionists?
Personally, I view this the way I view most sunshine laws. Sunshine, in general, is good. Everyone benefits from sunshine on the dirty cracks and actions, and anyone who is committing good actions shouldn't be worried about a little sunshine.
We require registration for legal ownership of guns. As long as we do that, any records such as these are public - to be seen by any of us.