March 26, 2012

Social Media, take a bizzilion

So another social-media conundrum showed up on my doorstep this past week.

As one of the managers of the PHS facebook page, I've taken it upon myself to occasionally check to see what people are posting to the page. The page was - and is - set-up to display only posts by the official PHS folks when you land there, but clicking can let you see posts by everyone - including this one...

...which directs you to this thread on which some of our students have taken to creating their own meme images. It's a simple enough site, one that's in the same vein as I Can Haz Cheezebuger on which people can type in their own messages to display over top of standard - and somewhat cliched - meme images (success kid, most interesting man in the world, socially awkward penguin).

The thread was started by one of our students. He's clearly named himself; his call. Most of the images have been posted anonymously, though one or two were perhaps foolishly signed. All are tied to Princeton High School by the thread title. Some are less than polite. Some are downright vulgar or offensive. Most are moderately funny and specific to PHS.

I'll include a few examples so you know the kind of stuff I'm talking about...






Here's the question now that I've seen these. As an officially designated person in charge of monitoring the PHS Facebook page, do I...
  1. ...inform the principal? He's made issue of OnlyAtPrinceton, a hashtag that students (and possibly teachers?) were using to 'discuss' Princeton on Titter. This isn't as popular (only about twenty-five meme posts so far and already fading by the time I'm writing this up on Saturday morning), nor is it nearly as negative.
  2. ...delete the post? I've deleted posts that were openly offensive or purely advertising. 
  3. ...leave the post and ignore it? After all, people have free speech, and if the school goes about the Facebook page allowing only pro-Princeton comments, that's sort of defeating the purpose of the interactive nature of the FB page.
  4. ...chuckle at some of the images, flag some as inappropriate, and post about the whole situation on my blog?  
I've chosen option #4.

March 24, 2012

Elite eight...again...



March 22, 2012

My Daily Blogs

There are a few blogs around that I check into daily. They're the usual sources of my weekend links. Today I'm adding in a new one, and I thought I'd make sure you knew which rounds I make.

In case you want to make them with me each day.

March 21, 2012

Another Lego blog?

Man, I love Legos, but there are a few reasons why I don't play with them very often.

First, building with Legos is an expensive hobby. Whether you're buying things from the direct market or from the grey market, Legos are quality built and appropriately priced. Heck, there are entire blogs pretty much devoted to telling you where you can find the best Lego sales.

Second, building with Lego bricks takes a bunch of time to get good. Some of the creations I've highlighted before took hundreds and hundreds of hours to complete. I may waste a lot of time in my life, but I have other ways to play around.

Third, the Lego creations I see on the web are awesome, and I'm kind of intimidated. Take, for example, the creations of Baron von Brunk, as shown on his tumblr.







The friggin' transformers actually transform.

Seriously...transformers made out of Lego...

I am humbled.

March 19, 2012

Vonne Gut Reactions: Cat's Cradle

Here's the stuff I've been looking for, a Kurt Vonnegut novel that I can say that I absolutely loved without reservation.

We are absent any sort of alien or time travel, though there is a science fiction aspect to the concept of ice-nine which leads to the tornadoes on the cover shown in today's post.

A few things I've been noticing along the way so far that I need to remember to check in before we wrap up Cat's Cradle and head on to God Bell You, Mr Rosewater or Pearls Before Swine: idealized images of women and Vonnegut's opinion of religion.

The second certainly comes up - and could be said to be the dominant theme of this novel. Of the former, I can say that there seems to be at least a little improvement. We'll get back to those two, however.

SPOLIERS - be warned

First, as I do, I'll offer up a little summary.

Our narrator and main character, John, begins the story researching a book about what happened on the day the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima. In the course of his investigation, John (no last name ever given) finds himself corresponding with the children of the fictitious Felix Hoenikker, father of the atomic bomb, as well as people around Ilium where Hoenikker did his atomic research. In the course of his investigations, John is introduced to the concept of ice-nine one which Hoenikker's obsessive attention was focused when he passed away many years prior.

When his research turns up little suggesting that his book would be feasible or interesting enough to continue to pursue, John turns his attention to a commissioned piece on Jullian Castle, a former playboy who has turned his charitable attention to building and running a hospital on the island nation of San Lorenzo. On the plane to the island, John meets up with two of the Hoenikker children who are on their way to meet their long-lost brother who is now a 'general' on San Lorenzo. Once there, John's journey takes a few unexpected turns as he briefly becomes the ruler of the island, marries the woman he loves, converts to a new religion, saves and then inadvertently destroys the world.

No biggie, just the end of all life as we know it.
---
This is the first novel in which Vonnegut reuses some of the settings and people in his fictional world. It's something tat I know comes back in many of his later novels.

We find ourselves back in Ilium, NY at the Ilium Research and Machine Works, the military installation where Hoenikker and other scientists partake in the pursuit of research for research's sake, looking into whatever happens to catch their attention and free to pursue whatever explorations that attention happens to flicker onto.

We also make a brief check-in on the Rumfoord Estate which played so prominently in The Sirens of Titan, this time a stop over for Bokonon to do a little yard work.

Vonnegut also continues to mention Indianapolis as a hometown or brief stop over for many of his characters, even going so far as to mention in this book that one of the characters finds Hoosiers running businesses and governmental posts all around the world.
---
Vonnegut also uses a another koan that will reappear in his later book, mentioning that the birds make the sound 'potee-phweet'.
---
I am not familiar with the word oubliette which Vonnegut uses to describe the hidden basement fortress in which our narrator waits out the initial destruction of the world. I had to look that one up.
---
Slaughterhouse Fiveis subtitled the Children's Crusade and finds Vonnegut in an old army buddy's kitchen hearing the buddy's wife accuse them of having been children when they fought in World War II.

Here in Cat's Cradle Vonnegut has the new ambassador to San Lorenzo gives a speech paying tribute to the Hundred Martyrs to Democracy (of San Lorenzo) in which he speaks of 'children dead, all dead, all murdered in war. It is customary on days like this to call such lost children men. I am unable to call them men for this simple reason: that in the same war in which lo Hoon-yera Mora-toorz tut Zamoo-cratz-ya [Hundred Martyrs to Democracy in the San Lorenzan dialect] died, my own son died...I do not say that children at war do not die like men, if they have to die...And I propose to you that if we are to pay our sincere respects to the hundred lost children of San Lorenzo, that we might best spend the day despising what killed them; which is to say, the stupidity and viciousness of all mankind."

Vonnegut's opinions of the world were clearly shaped by his time in World War II, and he does not speak of the glories of war but rather of the foolishness of war, of the need to and impossibility of never fighting another war. He doesn't hope to stop wars because he would sooner hope to stop wind, but rather Vonnegut seems to want us all to recognize that war serves no purpose other than to thin our ranks.
---
The father of Mona Aamons Monzano, our story's image of perfect beauty - more on that in a bit, was a Finn who
'was captured by the Russians, then liberated by the Germans during the Second World War...forced to serve in Wermacht engineer unit that was sent to fight the Yugoslav partisans. He was captured by Chetniks, royalist Servian partisans, and the by Communist partisans who attacked the Chetnicks. He was loberated by Italian parachutists who surprised the Communists, and he was shipped to Italy.

The Italians put him to work designing fortifications for Sicily. He stole a fishing boat in Sicily, and reached neutral Portugal.

While there, he met an American draft dodger named Julian Castle"
World War II was an intermingling of people of all nationalities, something that Vonnegut tells again and again in his books.
---
Now, to the recurring themes of religion and idealized women.

On page 219 of Cat's Cradle, Vonnegut writes that "[A]ll religions, including Bokononism, are nothing but lies."

One of the major plot threads in this book is the foolishness of religion, the idea that religion is simply a way for people to find comfort in something but which clearly offers Vonnegut no comfort at all.

Vonnegut even has our narrator end the book inspired by the words of Bokonon who has written...
If I were a younger man, I would write the history of human stupidity; and I would climb to the top of Mount McCabe; and I would lie down on my back with my history for a pillow; and I would take from the ground some of the blue-white poison [ice-nine] that makes statues of men; and I would make a statue of myself, lying on my back, grinning horribly, and thumbing my nose and You Know Who.
There's not a much stronger statement for Vonnegut to make about religion than that.

The religion of Bokononism is one made up entirely of inspirational lie, openly told as lies and commented as such. One of the more apocryphal quotes attributed to Vonnegut - and written in his own hand - is that he hoped when he died that people would say "Kurt's in Heaven now...it's one of [his] favorite jokes."
---
From Wikipedia...
"After World War II, Kurt Vonnegut worked in the public relations department for the General Electric research company. GE hired scientists and let them do pure research, and his job was to interview these scientists and find good stories about their research. Vonnegut felt that the older scientists were indifferent about the ways their discoveries might be used. The Nobel Prize-winning chemist Irving Langmuir, who worked with Vonnegut's older brother Bernard at GE, became the model for Dr. Felix Hoenikker. Vonnegut said in an interview with The Nation that "Langmuir was absolutely indifferent to the uses that might be made of the truths he dug out of the rock and handed out to whoever was around, but any truth he found was beautiful in its own right, and he didn’t give a damn who got it next.
---
We again get a taste of the idea that you are what you pretend to be, particularly if you pretend to be it long enough. In this case, Bokonon and Earl McCabe landed together on the shores of San Lorenzo. Once they realized that there was no reasonable way to improve the lives of the San Lorenzans, they chose to instead split their efforts, one becoming the epitome of good, a founder of a new religion who existed only as a hidden seer in the jungle, perfect good. McCabe, on the other hand, became the leader of the government, choosing to outlaw Bokononism and become the purity of 'evil'. Eventually, McCabe and his successor, 'Papa' Monzano, become true dictators, even impaling their subjects on the Hook.
---
Things are slightly improved in Vonnegut's treatment of women, but only slightly.

We have this time two examples of womanly perfection, women who are so gorgeous, perfect, loving, and wonderful that they cannot possibly be characters of more than one single dimension. Dr Hoenikker's first wife, Emily, is described by a stonecarver as "my first lady angel, if God ever sees fit to show me one, it'll be her wings and not her face that'll make my mouth fall open. I've already seen the prettiest face that ever could be. There wasn't a man in Ilium County who wasn't in love with her, secretly or otherwise. She could have had any man she wanted."

She is blindly devoted to Dr Hoenikker, a man whose one show of humanity toward his children is received with terror, sending his son screming from the house.

Mona Aamons Monzano is described by John as "the most heart-breakingly beautiful girl [he] ever hope[s] to see." Her beauty is so total and unassailable that she is the most treasured natural resource of San Lorenzo.

We do, however, get two more realistic female characters: Angela Hoenikker and Claire Minton. Claire is the wife of the new American ambassador to San Lorenzo, and while her part is certainly small, she isn't described to as being perfectly gorgeous or without flaw. She is a professional indexer who is able to tell much about Phillip Castle, Jullian's son, just from the index that he writes for his own book.

Angela Hoenikker is a new species for Vonnegut. She isn't a gorgeous woman. She has limited talents - taking care of her father, playing the clarinet - and a fairly miserable inner life and marriage. She actually exists as a semi-three-dimensional character here. She isn't our lead character by any mean, but she isn't a blank slate against which the male characters can throw their fantasies.

I don't know if this sort of growth will continue, but it's a solid start. If Vonnegut keeps up this growth, he just might be a decent writer.
---
The whole ice-nine thing...

I find the idea fascinating. There's just enough science there that I can accept it. I know that the phase diagram for water does have a number of different ice phases, none of which - by my understanding - copies itself instantly to water surrounding it.

The description of Hoenikker's ability to explain scientific ideas so clearly that anyone could understand, followed immediately by Vonnegut's explanation of ice-nine's properties and the analogy of stacking cannonballs and oranges is beautifully written.
---
Best Vonnegut yet...

March 17, 2012

Link, link, boboink...

Banana, fanana fo link...


Nation Abuzz With Prospect Of 18-Year-Old Boys Having Their Dreams Crushed



Get More: MTV Shows


March 16, 2012

Lonnieburger baskets: Tank's Bar & Grill (Dayton)

It's March so that means basketball. Next Thursday, for example, I have tickets to see the national DII men's semifinals at Bank of Kentucky arena over in Northern Kentucky. Hopefully Bellarmine will keep rolling along to at least then - and maybe to a second straight championship?

But I digress...

Calen and I trekked to the University of Dayton where we sadly saw the Vikes lose to the Middies - whose coach broke out Principal's heart last year, but that's neither here nor there. What is here and there is Tank's Bar & Grill (they provided the outside pic - no snow on the day we visited) in Dayton, a little down the road from the University of Dayton, a place that comes semi-recommended by RuffRyder (who used to and maybe still does frequent these parts). Calen texted and asked for a burger recommendation near his old campus, and he sent us to Tank's. Turns out, however, that he's never been there himself. He'd just heard that it was good.

So, let's put that quasi-recommendation to the test and see if anybody salutes.


Burger
  • Apologies for the photo quality that you're going to see a little later. I could blame Calen's camera, but mine's no better, honestly. This first pic, though, is spot on clear and you get about as good a pic of the burger as you're going to see.

    The burger is freshly made with loose form and slightly sloppy shaping. The beef seems to be of decent quality with a nicely moist feel and enough fat to leave my fingers shiny as I ate the burger. That's all good. The problem, however, comes with the purity of that beefiness. There seemed to be absolutely no spice in the burger at all - no salt, no pepper, no nothing. Calen and I both salted - and I peppered - our burgers and found them vastly improved. I'm not a salt freaky by any stretch of the imagination, but I do want some flavor other than the pure beef. Pure beef is bland, man, no matter how good it is.

    The burger wasn't crusty and was pushed a little beyond the medium that I had ordered - no pink anywhere to be found on mine or on Calen's (also ordered medium). So, what's that make? In almost rightly cooked, utterly unspiced, fresh beef burger. What's that worth? Burger - 6 

Fries
  • The fries in the top of the photo are in focus. Shut up...

    You can also see that they're also a little shiny (I don't want to say greasy, but they kind of were). They also weren't crispy in the least or very spiced. Clearly, Tank (Calen's pretty sure that Tank, himself, was at a table a couple away from us and might be eating a few too many of his own burgers...every day) isn't a man to overly (or remotely correctly) spice things. C'mon, man. They are, however, freshly cut. If you've had fries at Penn Station, you've had the fries at Tank's give or take. Fries - 5

 
Toppings
  • The bacon was bacony but not noteworthy.The onion was sharp and bitey, fresh. The cheese was melted and slightly translucent. The lettuce had cell walls and chloroplast and everything. Trust me; I saw them with my own bare eyes. The toppings were successfully placed on top of the burger. Nothing was wrong with them, but nothing was particularly right about them, either. Toppings - 5 

Ambiance
  •  I was surprised that Tank's turned out to be a disco on the inside...particularly because the outside doesn't seem all that disco-ey.

Wait, no, that was just my shaky camera skills. The flash was supposed to be off, but it turns out it wasn't. When the flash hit, I moved the stupid thing out of everybody's face so I wouldn't be that jerk-face who flashed his camera flash all over that place.

Ambiance
  • Tank's is a solid, neighborhood place. They've got a bar and a couple of rooms in which to dine. They've got nice, hanging plants over the bar. They've got restrooms that are sort of heated. They've got a bunch of televisions around - no flat screens here, though. Things are a little dated, but they're comfy and friendly. Ambiance - 6
Cost
  • $7.99 for the burger - cheese and bacon included...diet coke was a couple more bucks. That's right in the middle of the range. Cost - 5 
Other Stufffff
  • Seriously, the plants are a nice touch. Fresh oxygen in the room is always appreciated. +`1 
  • Um, there's not much else to be said about Tank's. It's not a bad place, but it's the kind of place that exists pretty much in every town. 
The math isn't looking too good for Tank's. Where do they fall?

Tank's Bar & Grill got 28 points.

  • Terry's Turf Club - 45
  • Cafe de Wheels - 44
  • Senate - 43 
  • City View Tavern - 40 (scaled from 32/40)
  • Stuffed on Vine - 38
  • Five Guys Burgers and Fries - 36 
  • Roxy's - 36
  • VanZandt - 34
  • Gabby's - 34 
  • Oakley Pub & Grill - 34 
  • Quatman's - 32 / 34.5
  • Troy's - 32 
  • By Golly's - 32
  • Wildflower Cafe - 31.25 (scaled from 26/40) 
  • Sidetracks - 31
  • Virgil's Cafe - 28 
  • Tank's Bar & Grill - 28
  • The Pub at Rookwood Mews - 28
  • Smashburger - 28
  • Habits Cafe - 28
  • Graffiti Burger - 27
  • Arthur's - 26
  • Sammy's - 25 
  • Gordo's - 20
Maybe we should try Doubleday's.

March 15, 2012

Update: Einstein on the Beach - reflections

 Some footage from the Ann Arbor performance...

"You don't have to understand anything. It's a work where you go, and you can get lost...and that's the idea." - Robert Wilson

Return of the Revenge of the Random Ten

Let's take a look at what came up in cop-out-post land today, shall we?
  • "Pride" by U2 - (3stars) - live version grabbed from a bootleg via bit torrent when I downloaded the entire U2 oeuvre a while back...I've been getting worse about doing that (sorry, Hilltop Hoods, Michael Martin Murphey, Beautiful South, Ryan Adams, Dave Matthews Band) torrent thing...this one's an okay live version, but there's nothing to distinguish it from a hundred other versions that just didn't have the fortune to be put to tape/electrons...great song from a great band, though...
  • "Belong" by R.E.M. - (4 stars) - great, spoken-word song from the boys from Athens...love the wordless chorus and Michael Stipe's understated, poetic lyrics...screams early 90's to me...quality snaps and handclaps, too...'whispered with kong, kong, belong'...
  • "El Hombre Impasible" by Cafe Tacuba - (3 stars) - no clue what this one's about...might be gorgeous love song or boastful throwdown...it's in Spanish, and I don't speak a lick of it...saw Cafe Tacuba on Austin City Limits a few years back and have been a casual fan since...this one's from their great Yo Soy album which is way more experimental than this track would suggest
  • "Freddie's Dead" by Fishbone - (3 stars) - great song by Curtis Mayfield from the blacksplotation classic Superfly which I've sadly never seen...average cover by a weird, early 90's funk band
  • "Running to Stand Still" by Elbow - (4 stars) - one of my favorite U2 songs...solid cover that heads a little more piano in mood but keeps the aching of the original
  • "I Love a Rainy Night" by Eddie Rabbit - (4 stars) - man, I love this one...nice, pop country vibe with snaps and jangly guitar...I see the original black and white video (which I can't find on YouTube, sadly)...
  • "L-O-V-E (Multi-lingual verson)" by Nat King Cole - (3 stars) - I appreciate when artists record hits in various languages...the Beatles "Sie liebt dich" and "Komm gib mir deine hand" come to mind best...this one's got a solid German verse in the middle...fun times...
  • "Cold Sweat" by James Brown - (3 stars) - Live at the Apollo is a time capsule album, perfectly capturing what I imagine when I think of a James Brown show...this one's about right...nice playful interaction between the band and The Man, himself...
  • "Defend Atlantis" by Flobots - (3 stars) - the album that has "Handlebars" also has a lot of weaker tracks...
  • "Don't Get Me Wrong" by The Pretenders - (5 stars) - the best of the week came up first (but got posted last)...perfect song...


March 14, 2012

Really?



I'm sure people were innocent in the 1960's when "Nut Rocker" came out, but really?

I Love It

The Girl has said a number of times that I tend to fixate on music, listening over and over to a particular song or album to the exclusion of everything else.

This week's obsession comes from Down Under as the Hilltop Hoods released their first single from their new album, Drinking in the Sun, which hasn't been released just yet in the US. I did manage to find a copy on the torrent network, however, so I'll be taking a listen this weekend. I'll give a full reporting, promise.

For the moment, though, dig on the three official videos for the first single "I Love It", because I do.

The first is my preference and is kind of awesome...the other two certainly aren't bad, though...



March 13, 2012

Two of my passions

The Lego Architecture line has been out for a while now, presenting sets that are microscale versions of some pretty famous landmarks. I've bought (and gifted) the Sears Tower and would love to have Falling Water and the Robie House, but they're a little pricey to build and stick on a shelf somewhere - especially for a set without a minifig anywhere to be found.

All that's neither here nor there. What is, however, is that they're currently conducting a vote to see which buildings should inspire them for their next sets. They're not promising to actually produce any of the sets but just to see which buildings we want them to be inspired by.

It's interesting to see just how evenly split the vote is with all ten (as I write this post) between 16146 and 16530 votes. There's apparently no consensus among these ten.

Make your voice heard with your three votes.

March 12, 2012

Wikipedia: the cause of and solution to so many of our problems

Each day I look up some date in history and write that year as today's date on the board in my classroom.

Today, for example, was 12 March, 1912 in honor of the founding of the Girl Scouts. I then draw a stick figure representation of the event and encourage my students to guess the event. Especially considering my limited art skills, they do pretty well.

It helps me that Wikipedia has an article of every day's significant (by whatever definition the Wikipedia community chooses to define that word) events, births, and deaths. Check out March 12, for example.

I also tend to check the History Channel's Today in History as another source of events and today found that the 1888 blizzard that hit NYC and dumped 40" of snow happened on this date. In the History Channel's article on the blizzard, I found this sentence...
Even "Leather Man," a fixture of New York and Connecticut history who had walked a circuit of 365 miles every 34 days for three decades, was reportedly delayed four days by the Blizzard of 1888.
Clearly, I had to head to Wikipedia to find out about this "Leather Man". I quote from their article here...
The Leatherman (ca. 1839–1889) was a particular vagabond, famous for his handmade leather suit of clothes, who traveled a circuit between the Connecticut and the Hudson River from about 1856 to 1889. Although of unknown origin, he was thought to be Canadian, or possibly French, because of his fluency in French, his broken English and the French Language prayer book found on his person after his death. His identity remains controversial, and unknown.
How fascinating is that? He apparently made his 365-mile circuit around Connecticut every thirty-four days like clockwork, regularly enough that when the blizzard delayed him, people noticed.

I love...Love...LOVE that Wikipedia has documented Leather Man (or Leatherman or Leather-Man).

Could such a person exist in today's world? They could, right? It would be weird but not unheard of, I would guess.


The most wonderful time...of the year

I love March...love it...

I've seen a half dozen high school basketball games in the past few weeks (though, sadly, the Princeton Vikings came up short in both girls and boys this year). I also managed to catch the Bellarmine-NKU women's game a while back and am hoping to catch Bellarmine's men's team in the elite eight in a week or so.

Plus, the D-I championships are ready to get under way after eight of the top ten teams (including all of the top four) lost this past week.

And, MIT is playing the D-III national semifinals this weekend. Go Engineers!

Now I just have to get to Thursday so I can watch games for four straight days.

March 10, 2012

My eyes, the links do nothing!



 

March 8, 2012

I hate horror...



That's part one of an eighty-part found-footage horror series on YouTube.

I hate Matt for showing it to me because it's terrifying and well done and frustrating and thoroughly engrossing and scary as hell.

I'm currently somewhere around part 35 or so (entry 26) - most of which are posted by MarbleHornets but some of which posted by ToTheArk.

I know it's all fiction and that there's even a Wiki site about the series, but I'm still freaked out. I'm gonna put the book in the freezer for tonight and head to bed - hopefully to pleasant dreams.


March 7, 2012

Whither Henryville?

I don't know what to say about the destruction in Henryville, IN.

I knew a teacher at Henryville High School a couple of decades ago and grew up not twenty miles from the High School that no longer exists.

I know I wondered why Princeton cancelled all evening activities this past Friday night, but I stopped wondering after I heard the stories on Saturday morning. Moscow, OH...Henryville, IN...and lots of other cities saw destruction that I hope never to experience but know that I'm lucky to have never seen. Thirty nine people died in one of the largest early-season tornadic outbreaks in recorded history.

I wish the families and folks well.






I can happily say that my folks lost nothing more serious than an awning, but I'll be sending my donation to help out. Give if you've got a couple of bucks.

March 6, 2012

Vonne Gut Reactions: Mother Night

Three down...eleven novels (and various short story compilations) to go...

Finally, this is what I was looking for from Vonnegut. There's nobody from Mercury, nobody being replaced by a computer, no futuristic settings, no harmoniums, no peat carved into sirens. Instead we get people...humans...flawed and imperfect.

As always, spoilers abound...

You have been warned...

Vonnegut opens the book with an introduction in which he writes "This is the only story of mine whose moral I know. I don't think it's a marvelous moral, I just happen to know what it is...'We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be' " and amends that "When you're dead, you're dead." and even offers that "yet another moral occurs to [him] now; Make love when you can. It's good for you."

The simplistic, direct route makes for a pretty spectacular Vonnegut introduction, tying himself into the background of the book, having been a World War II soldier, himself. The rest of the book is framed as being a memoir of Howard W Campbell, Jr., a Nazi propagandist and broadcaster who was secretly an American agent providing coded messages in his daily radio broadcasts during World War II.

Very few people, however, know that Campbell was an American spy - himself, his army contact, and FDR, himself. Everyone else in the world believes Campbell to be a former Nazi now living in New York City as an old, broken man with one friend, a chess player who lives in an apartment downstairs.

Once Campbell's open secret gets out, however, his life turns to crap pretty quickly as he is 'saved' by a white supremacist (with a black chauffeur), reunited with his 'wife' (lost and assumed dead for thirty years), captured by American agents, attacked by the American soldier who captured him in World War II, forced from his home by looters, and finally taken to Israel to stand trial as he hands himself over to a Jewish dentist in his apartment building.

It's not exactly a laugh riot, admittedly, but it is the best thing I've read in Vonnegut's first three novels in spite of the fact that Vonnegut himself gave The Sirens of Titan an A grade.

---

We continue to struggle to find a fully-realized female character as Calen had wondered from book one. The only two female characters are Campbell's wife Helga, who isn't in the novel much and whose position on a pedestal is to high and unassailable that the second female character, Resi, Helga's sister, is able to impersonate Helga with little more than a dye job and a story. So much of Campbell's life image is wrapped up in his wife that her disappearance - with no conclusive end - just ruins him to the modern day, but that doesn't mean that Helga is anything resembling a three-dimensional character. She is written in reflection as the madonna and the whore (Campbell's The Monogamous Casanova is about as clear a paean to wanting a woman to be both of those identities as is possible), as the perfect actress, as the most beautiful woman ever...but she isn't a person in any real way.

Resi, then, loves Campbell as a thirteen- (or so) year old, but it is played as puppy love, something that Campbell brushes off with little thought but who then comes back to be Campbell's Helga just when he needs her the most. Resi, however, doesn't love Campbell in any rich, well thought-out way but rather looks to trap Campbell in the memory of a false love and then reveal herself after one night of connubial bliss. There isn't a relationship there. There isn't love. There's deception that - once achieved - is immediately abandoned.

---

Vonnegut's exploration of  belief systems that he clearly finds abhorrent is fascinating as he describes the white supremacists as deliberately filing the teeth off of their mental gears, something that he speaks proudly of having never done to himself. He may have lied; he may have had teeth missing from those gears, but he never deliberately filed he own gears dull. He may have spent forty years playing the best possible Nazi he could while secretly - and only to three people in the world - supporting America, promoting the Nazi beliefs far and wide over the air waves. He drew caricatures of jews for target practice, thinking he was drawing a ridiculous stereotype but instead finding that his Nazi masters loved the target, that Campbell's work increased the shooting skills of Nazis, and that the white supremacists were still using the target.

Campbell at one point is asked by the Blue Fairy, his American spy handler, where he would have been had the Nazis won, had Campbell never been able to tell anyone that he was really an American agent. Campbell says he would certainly have lead a successful life high up in the Nazi hierarchy, continuing as a propagandist but not ever writing a novel or play again in his life. He might not have believed the Nazi beliefs, but he had played the part long enough and well enough that he would continue to play it through simple momentum for a few more decades.

---

In Mother Night we again get Vonnegut musing on friendship and particularly on the traitorous end of friendship. In Sirens of Titan, Unk/Malachi killed his best friend on Mars, Stony Stevenson, because the Martians controlled his brain and wiped his memories of Stony. The traitorous act haunted Unk/Malachi until the end of his life, only being resolved in a fever dream on the moment of his death.

Here Campbell recounts the tale of two significant betrayals of friendship. The first is Campbell's betrayal, taking his friend's motorcycle, the one significant possession his friend had in the falling moments of Nazi Germany. Campbell's friend even tells him that the motorcycle is the only thing that ever mattered to him, that he wouldn't give up smoking to save his wife but that he gave up smoking to save his motorcycle. Campbell, then, 'borrowed' the motorcycle knowing that he would never return it.

In his later days Campbell was the victim of such a betrayal as his downstairs neighbor and only friend in New York City Kraft/Potapov turns out to be a Russian spy who decides to turn him over the to Russian authorities but finds himself captured instead by the American agents lead by the Blue Fairy Godmother.

---

Onward we roll along to Vonnegut's return to science fiction with Cat's Cradle.

March 5, 2012

Cover tune grab bag

Thanks to Daily What's Kicka$$ Cover of the Day series for showing me this one.



And to me for wandering onward to find the rest of MercyMe's Cover Tune Grab Bag series.

March 4, 2012

Links: The Links

Matt Damon!






February 29, 2012

My choices...

EW.com's got a list of their 25 Greatest Working directors. Because it's my blog and I'm a narcissist, here are my favorite movies from each of those directors...
  • 25 - Guillermo del Toro - Pan's Labyrinth (surprisingly tough call over Hellboy II)
  • 24 - Pedro Almodovar - um, who?
  • 23 - Spike Lee - 25th Hour (or Inside Man)
  • 22 - Brad Bird - Ratatouille 
  • 21 - Clint Eastwood - Unforgiven
  • 20 - David Lynch - The Straight Story 
  • 19 - Werner Herzog - Grizzly Man 
  • 18 - Peter Jackson - Lord of the Rings: Return of the King 
  • 17 - Roman Polanski - Chinatown 
  • 16 - Todd Haynes - Far From Heaven 
  • 15 - James Cameron - The Terminator 
  • 14 - Mike Leigh - um, who?
  • 13 - Darren Arnofsky - The Fountain (Pi and Black Swan are pretty awesome, too)
  • 12 - Lars von Trier - Dogville 
  • 11 - Woddy Allen - Annie Hall 
  • 10 - Paul Thomas Anderson -Boogie Nights (with Punch Drunk Love a close second)
  • 9 - Kathryn Bigelow - The Hurt Locker 
  • 8 - Alexander Payne - Election 
  • 7 - Joel & Ethan Coen - The Big Lebowski (surprisingly stiff competition from True Grit, No Country for Old Men, O, Brother Where Art Thou, and Raising Arizona)
  • 6 - Terrence Malick - The Thin Red Line 
  • 5 - Christopher Nolan - The Dark Knight (tough choice over pretty much everything else he's done)
  • 4 - Martin Scorsese - Goodfellas (tough over Raging Bull, The Last Waltz, Taxi Driver)
  • 3 - David Fincher - Fight Club 
  • 2 - Quentin Tarantino - Inglorious Basterds 
  • 1 - Steven Speilberg - 1941 (I was surprised how many of his movies I like but how few I love.)

February 28, 2012

Einstein on the Beach - reflections


We're a month out from having traveled to the northern, frozen wastelands of Ann Arbor, MI (though it won't be frozen for long) to see the opening night preview performance of Philip Glass and Robert Wilson's Einstein on the Beach, the first performance of the opera in twenty years, the opening preview night of only the fifth staging of the opera ever.

First off, I will say that it's an amazing piece of work - the music, the performance, the repetition, the experience, everything. The opera has to be one of the most unique, stunning, repetitive, meditative experiences that I've ever been a part of. I don't know that I understand the piece - even a tenth or a hundredth of the piece, but I'm absolutely thrilled that I was there.

The work was, admittedly, long - four and a half hours in length, top to tail, performed without an intermission, meaning that people had to make their own breaks. The Girl took two breaks in the performance, but I never left the theater. It made for a very odd, gorgeous experience with acts and scenes progressing with little connection from one to the other, something that I've certainly never experienced in my theater-going experience.



I keep struggling to use the term 'opera' to describe Einstein as my views of opera have always involved telling a story via song, acting, and dance, and Einstein certainly isn't any sort of storytelling. It is, in fact, the antithesis of story. Each act, each scene (?), each movement seems to exist in total independence of the others, utilizing the same performers but often without any relation to them having been on stage previously. The music is repetitive to a fault, something that I found meditative and gorgeous but something that The Girl found - and know going in that she would find - the music droning and tedious.

To me the repetition of the music allowed me to often slip away from the music, to let my mind drift and focus on the details of the performance. At times there was so much action on stage - a dozen performers each moving and singing, dancing or standing still but shifting their head or their hands or even one finger - that I found the visuals hard to follow. I had to choose to follow one performer for a time and then to shift my attention elsewhere, only to find myself shocked at the changes that had taken place before I could look back.

At other times, the repetition took place around a nearly empty stage with two, one, or - in one notable scene shown at the top of this post - no one on stage for twenty (?) minutes in which a single, brilliant, huge bar of light shifted from horizontal to vertical and then rose off the stage at a glacial pace. Neither - the action-filled stage or the person-less stage was any less fascinating. Both were utterly mesmerizing.


The above scene, for example (photo from the 1992 production), consisted of...
  • the man in red (front, right) writing on an invisible chalkboard with one repeated motion for twenty minutes without any other motion
  • the boy on the balcony holding and rotating a glowing cube for minutes at a time breaking his motion up only by pulling paper airplanes from his satchel and throwing them onto the stage
  • the two-dimensional train smoking for the full twenty minutes before finally sliding onto the stage while the engineer smoked his pipe, not speaking or moving otherwise
  • one dancer methodically dancing diagonally back and forth from the back right to front left corner, sometimes seeming to move slightly further left with each pass and sometimes seeming to make the exact...same...path with every pass...the pacing of the dancing, the other motion going on the whole time made it almost impossible to discern whether the progression was real or in my mind
  • the newspaper-holding dancer working his way across the stage in an labyrinthine but rectilinear pathway full of ninety degree angles
  • the shell-holding man on the left walking almost as John Cleese's Ministry of Silly Walks sketch across the stage
I wanted to watch every person to see what they were doing, to see if they would make some change to their action that would reveal something, but I couldn't watch them all so I found myself having to alternately split my attention among them all and focus on one to the exclusion of the others knowing that it was the only way I could  have any hope of being anything other than surprised by the changes I had missed.

Though every scene was both stunning and tedious, three scenes in particularly stood out to me:
  • The person-less stage with the light making progress with the music became an entirely meditative moment, knowing that the motion was so slow that I could turn away but knowing that there was nothing to which I could turn my attention. It was gorgeous.
  • One scene in particular had an extended saxophone solo played while the entire cast - twenty-plus performers - came onto the stage to stand in front of a scrim on which was painted a building (shown to the right in the 1992 production) with a man with chalk. The saxophone was so different from the rest of the music, almost something you would hear in a 1980's movie soundtrack over a long pair of legs - only if those legs were on screen for half an hour (maybe, I lost track of time repeatedly through the night) while every performer walked on stage one at a time, turning to look at the chalk-holding man before another performer entered.
  • The finale was a huge set piece with the whole orchestra and all the performers on a three-story set, each standing in front of a light design or circles, graphs, and lines while two identically-dressed performers shifted up and down, back and forth across the stage in glass boxes.The scale of the set was stunning after so many minimalist sets, sometimes no more than light on a blank stage with ballet dancers crossing the stage.

There were very few things that I could definitively say reference Einstein, and none of those were ever made obvious or overt.
  • The concept of trains appeared numerous times, and I know Einstein initially described the theory of relativity, the concept that each of us moves in reference to our frame as two people on neighboring trains seeing the other begin to move and not knowing which of them was moving. Movement from either without a non-moving frame of reference would be impossible to identify as movement from either.
  • At one point the singers stuck out their tongues after furiously 'brushing' their teeth with toothbrushes. Einstein does have a famous photo of him sticking his tongue out.
  • The trial scenes took place in front of a backdrop of an eclipse with two pinpoints of light, one on each side of the moon. One of the most famous public proofs of the theory of relativity involved the lensing of a distant star around an eclipse, allowing us to see in action the lensing effects of gravity.
  • A scrim dropped in front of the three-story scene depicting an atomic explosion (a mushroom cloud) with scientific explanations abounding. Einstein certainly had much to do with the ideas behind the atomic bomb.
Other than those, I really don't know what much of the piece had to do with Einstein...which is both beautiful and frustrating.

There was a film booth in the theater lobby in which anyone could sit down and give their impressions - before, during, after the performances. We eschewed the booth, even as the opening night performance was held back half an hour due to the nasty, snow-covered roads. I did, however, get to spend some time in the lobby (we got there forty-five minutes before the intended curtain) watching the guy on the right of this video.

I couldn't tell if he was entirely there, somehow mentally off, or just eccentric. The Girl came down in the camp of eccentric.



I was amazed at how many times in the performance I laughed. Because of the constant repetition, even the smallest human moments were beautifully rewarding. When one performer, for example, stalked onto the stage with exaggerated, dramatic steps and turned toward the crowd flashing a huge smile, the entire audience laughed out loud. Such small moments because huge because of the lack of time frame, the disconnection from the passage of time - something that I imagine was referencing Einstein, as well.

There are very few photos - and no videos - from the 2012 performances that I can find online. Here are the few (all of which will make gorgeous desktop backgrounds at school) that I can find thanks to the pomegranate arts who put on this year's shows.






You can get some scenes from the 1984 production below, interspersed with interview clips with Wilson and Glass, themselves. The 2012 production was, from what I can see in all the images and clips on the web, substantively identical to the 1984 (and, I assume, original productions). Einstein - in a surprisingly small part, really - was played by an Asian women instead of a white man, but the sets, the costumes, the staging that you can see in the video are all very much like what we saw in Ann Arbor.



If you want to know more about Einstein, check out this documentary on the opera. You'll get to see footage from the 1984 production. It's uploaded to YouTube in its entirety but broken into four parts totaling nearly an hour long.



Everyone at a musical performance takes in the performance on their own. This work, however, seems even more so as there is no story, no path to take with your fellow theater-goers. To this end, I thoroughly enjoyed the reactions of the people near us.

The Girl was beside an older couple who spent large swaths of the performance dozing.

We had a couple behind us who leaned in as the bar of light tilted and rose and asked each other, "Do you know what this movement is called?"..."How to waste ten minutes."...Ten minutes later they leaned together and amended the previous statement to "twenty minutes"...

Beside me, sitting solo at the end of our row, was a man who knew the music backwards and forward, asking me why people would be leaving at this moment, if they had no idea what was coming next. I didn't admit to him that I didn't have any clue what was coming, that I'd never actually listened to the work in its entirety - or as entire as the three-cd set that I have (and that is apparently four cds).

To quote these people who were at the Saturday performance (I was at Friday's), "I think this is one of Philip Glass's best operas about Einstein."



I would certainly agree with that assessment, and I'm thrilled that I got to see this phenomenal work in its entirety.

...and I owe The Girl big time...

February 27, 2012

February 25, 2012

The links of the weak

Short list of links this week...maybe more next week...maybe...




The City of Samba from Jarbas Agnelli on Vimeo.






February 23, 2012

From the weekend...

This past weekend's SNL was outstanding...enjoy 'em...


Can't go wrong with Justin Timberlake...