Showing posts with label media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label media. Show all posts

February 9, 2011

A Quick Primer

This time, I'm talking primer like an introductory textbook, not Primer like the most awesome movie ever.

This one's about a series of primers (pronounced pr-short i-mers) from the AV Club on a number of different topics.

Want a beginner's guide to 80's sitcoms...Alan Moore...Canadian indie-rock...Neil Young...they've got 'em.

In fact, they have thirty-one articles in their primer series.

Go ahead, learn something.

January 11, 2011

Pardon our ramblings: Gabrielle Giffords & the tone of our discourse

(Please read the last couple of parts if nothing else.  I know it's long.  Feel free to skip the beginning; they're just ramblings.  The later part actually turns into something I'm kind of proud of.)

The shooting of Gabrielle Giffords on Saturday has been an interesting newsmaker.



The misreporting of the incident to initially include the Congresswoman's death was understandable in light of the likely chaos at the scene as well as the proliferation of amateur newsreporters via cellphone, twitter, YouTube, and the rest of Web 2.0.

I've actually been very happy not to have seen any sort of amateur video of the incident posted on YouTube...yet.  It's amazing that in our era of constant internet connectivity, omnipresent cellphone cameras, and unstoppable media leakage that no one has posted this video.  I will be even happier if no video of the incident exists or at least is ever posted online.



My CORE (our advisory students) today asked a number of really interesting questions about the incident.  Following our daily announcements, a separate announcement was made asking for a moment of silence for the six people who were killed in the incident.  After the announcement, I asked how many of my fifteen students knew about the event.  About half did, and we had a good discussion about the facts of the case for about ten minutes.



TheDailyWh.at covered the event via continual updates on their initial post.  I know I'm newish to the whole TheDailyWh.at thing, but they aren't one to give most news stories more than passing mention.  They aren't a news agency.  To me, the fact that they covered the event was surprising.


Much of the discussion after the incident focused on the increasingly angry and violent tone of our political discourse and how this might have contributed to the likelihood of such an attack.  On the surface this seems very reasonable and relevant.  I'm not sure that, upon further investigation, however that this connection should be automatically made.  The shooter - I'll say alleged shooter because the legal convention deems that I must label him thusly until conviction thought the idea of anyone but Jared Lee Loughner being convicted of this seems ludicrous - seems to be entirely unhinged.

His YouTube videos are nothing if not paranoid, and what little we know about the young man does not suggest someone driven to the brink by political decisions and rational if angry and vitriolic debate so much as a modern day Travis Bickle or Jack D Ripper, a man who has taken the smallest nuggets of political ramblings and allowed them to fester and foment within an obviously twisted mind until the only 'rational' response was the kill the enemy wherever they were to be found and identified.

The crazed actions of one man do not mean that an entire society's actions should be condemned.  Yes, we do need to shift our political - and non-political discourse - into a more civil direction.  While I disagree with Glenn Beck and Bill O'Reilly and Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin, turning them into demagogues and demons isn't any more appropriate a response than is their blind, angry lashings out.  Better, instead, to take the routes of Stephen Colbert and Tiny Fey in turning them into punchlines.  Humor will always win more converts than will vitriol.


Thankfully, very few people have reacted positively to the shooting.

One online comic retailer, however, posted a link to the news story in a forum on what appears to be his personal blog.  He headlined the post "1 down, 534 to go" referring to the combined number of Senators and US Representatives.  (See the post cached if, as I did earlier, you have trouble seeing the original post.)  In the post, he appears to be endorsing the armed attacking if not outright killing of members of our government.  The post was linked to from Comics Alliance, and that's how I found out about it.

The poster in question - Travis Corcoran - is the proprietor of Heavy Ink, and online comic distributor.  Corcoran runs a very political blog in which he openly advocates for the right of the people to bring up arms against their oppressors, oppressors in the name of the American government.  After the furor that the "1 down" post raised, Corcoran posted an entry clarifying his political beliefs.  In it, Corcoran admits that his post was intentionally callous but that he does not endorse the shooting of politicians because...
I think that today, there is little or no serious prospect for rolling back government by taking up arms. That, alone, disqualifies the idea of a revolution in 2011.
...a position that he bases on his Catholic beliefs and a Vatican catechism on Just War (to which he incorrectly links - corrected link here, scroll to 2309).

Admirably, Corcoran has allowed a discussion of his positions on a Heavy Ink forum.  Equally admirably, the tone of that discussion has been absolutely respectful and a spectacular example of how intelligent, rational discourse can be held over an issue that could very well devolve into the sort of violent name calling that has been so recently decried in the media.

I highly recommend reading the forum discussion to see how well discussions can be held when everyone involved takes the high road but is still willing to state their case.

Thank you to Travis Corcoran, Comics Alliance, Heavy Ink, and most especially to Heavy Ink's forum writers for inadvertently pointing out such a spectacular example of high-minded discourse.



The original title of this post was "If ever a boycott were in order", and my intent was to eventually point out the hateful writings of Mr Corcoran and discuss the consequences that a person's choice to make their private views very public can have on their professional lives (something of which I am constantly aware as I write this blog every day), but as I read the Heavy Ink forum, I felt my disappointment with Mr Corcoran's espoused beliefs lifting as his customers (many now more properly titled former customers) remained rational and friendly while putting forth their opinions.

I don't take advantage of Heavy Ink's services and likely would choose not to after reading Mr Corcoran's missives.  In spite of my turning of this post into something more positive than I may have initially intended, please do remember that our greatest weapon in protesting or disagreeing with the merchants who service us is our purchasing power.  If you firmly believe strongly that your merchants are doing wrong - politically, economically, racially, whatever-ly - do your due diligence and research, inform them of your views and your intent to take your business elsewhere, give them an opportunity to right their actions, and if they choose not to change, speak with your wallet and take your business elsewhere.

Boycotts can be powerful things.

(By the way, did any of you know that boycott came from Charles Boycott who was the first person to be boycotted?  I love Wikipedia.)

October 18, 2010

Taking a little inventory

I'm a list kinda guy.

Top five things I miss about Laura?  I'm in.

Dozens of lists about the 90's?  Go right ahead, mister.

100 best YouTube videos for science teachers?  I'll kill an hour or so.

So when the AV Club has an entire category that they refer to simply as inventory, I'm all down.

And it helps, of course, that they're interesting lists...
And there are another two-hundred-sixty more list articles in their weekly series.

I've got some reading to do, folks.

    October 6, 2010

    How am I paying attention to media if I'm this busy?

    The Simpsons Movie - I can't think of a movie that came in the middle of an ongoing series that was actually any good.  Of course, I can only think of two movies in that category: this one and The X-Files.  In defense of The Simpsons Movie, this is the best movie that I can think of in that category.

    It's a shortish movie - 87 minutes - that feels more like a passable episode of the television show than it does like any sort of actual movie.  Sadly, though, it doesn't even feel like one of the particularly good episodes of the series.  Just felt like a mediocre and largely predictable episode of The Simpsons.  Yeah, there are a few chucklesome lines here and there, but there's no reason for this movie to have been made.

    Quick question...why will The Simpsons eventually go off the air?  I can't think of any particular reason that the voice talent will leave their jobs at this point.  They've swapped writers in and out for two decades now.  The actors never really age.  Is Dan Castelleneta going to have to die?  They moved on from Phil Hartman, but he was largely a bit player.  Maybe if Hank Azaria kicks it.


    The Dinner Game - Subtitles...I warn you in advance that this film is in French which means you'll have to read the subtitles unless you're way more comfortable with French than either The Girl or I are.

    This is the original French version of what was adapted and released this summer as Dinner for Schmucks.  It's a far more streamlined film - much closer to its roots as a stage play.  It's very enjoyable but very different from its much flashier, much bigger budget American adaptation.

    Take, for example, the main character.  In the American version, Paul Rudd's character isn't cheating on his girlfriend.  It's a misunderstanding from a one-night stand that he had a few years back.  In the French version, he has a consistent mistress.  In the American version, he's going to the titular dinner because he feels he has to in order to advance in the company.  It's a once-a-month dinner, and this is his first time.  In the French version, he's a regular who's been doing this for years and even has scouts out looking for the next fool for his weekly dinner.  The Paul Rudd character is far more likable and easier to sympathize with.

    The French version also lacks the neat and tidy wrap-up in which the fool and the main character become tight friends after some sort of redemptive scene between the two.  We also never make it to the eponymous dinner in the French version, meaning that we never get to see more than a glimpse of the dinner when the main character calls to give his regrets for the current week.

    It's a funny film but with a much darker tone than the far more widely-appealing American version.

    Enjoyable.

    Skaar: Son of Hulk - I've come to dig John Romita, Jr's art style, and he's all over this volume telling the tale of Hulk's orphaned son's development on his home planet, Sakaar.  We get the initial story of his birth in the lava lakes and his subsequent adoption by some of the planet's residents as the second coming of their Green Scar savior.

    In the beginning, Skaar is a voiceless, brutal killing machine.  Over the course of the book, we get increasing glimpses of the thought behind the actions and Skaar becomes more and more verbal, more and more cerebral through the course of the story.  We also see that Skaar is not necessarily the savior that the people of the planet believe as actions that appear to be altruistic sometimes turn out not to be.

    I read the totality of World War Hulk and enjoyed it.  I went back and tried Planet Hulk, the storyline immediately preceding WWH and found myself bored, so I kind of assumed this would be every bit as boring.  Not so much.

    Actually enjoyed the progression of the titular character as well as the artwork from John Romita Jr.  I like his art style more and more with each book of his that I read.

    All in all, an entertaining read...but not as good as...


    Hulk: Son of Banner - I have no frickin' clue how Skaar would've gotten from Sakaar (his home planet of death) to Earth.  That isn't covered in this volume and doesn't really matter.  We open with a de-hulked Bruce Banner meeting his son, Skaar and Skaar informing daddy that his goal is to kill the Hulk for abandoning him on Sakaar.

    Banner knows that he's likely to become the Hulk again at some point, so he sets out to train Skaar in how to be deal with various opponents - Daken, the Juggernaut, Red Hulk, even Norman Osborne's underlings.

    These encounters are entertaining and well written as we learn more and more about Skaar and his true motivations throughout the tales, but the real fun of this volume comes through the revelation of Bruce Banner as a credible threat in his own right.

    Marvel has taken to naming various people as the "fifth smartest person on the planet" or the "third smartest person on the planet", and Banner is named as being in that club.  He continually thinks one step ahead of everyone he meets and seems to have a genius contingency plan for every possibility.  There's one particularly entertaining back and forth with Victoria Hand, Norman Osborne's second in command.  It's reminiscent of a childhood game of pretend in which each person takes turns making up some way to say that they had already expected the other's move and had already planned for that action. 

    It is this revelation of Bruce Banner as being a foe equally as dangerous as - but drastically different from - the Hulk that makes for the value of this volume and that makes this volume as entertaining as it is.


     Scott Pilgrim vs the World: Soundtrack - The movie was a bit of a disappointment, and this soundtrack was, as well.  The talent laid out is strong, but there are a lot of songs that just didn't connect with me - something not terrifically surprising considering where my tastes lie in comparison to those of the movie protagonists around whom the soundtrack is based.

    This is music with a heavy fuzz peddle.  There isn't a clear guitar riff to be heard throughout much of the album, but there's distortion and speed and anger - all of which perfectly match the feeling and musical styling of the movie adaptation.

    For me, only a couple of the songs resonate - "Black Sheep" by Metric, "It's Getting Boring By the Sea" by Blood Red Shoes.  Throw in a couple of lines from the movie that I'm thrilled to now have, and this makes for a pretty successful soundtrack.

    Just not one that interests me for more than a quick burn from the library copy.


    Transmetropolitan vol 1 & 0 - I started in onto the run on Transmetropolitan - the full run of which PLCH owns - with these first two volumes.  Well, these were my first two volumes, but I found out pretty quickly that Vol 0 isn't something that should necessarily come first.  Vol 0 is a collection of two special issues showcasing the main character being drawn by a number of celebrity guest artists.  Entertaining and pretty, but I'm thinking there are a number of things that I missed having not read the rest of the series.

    Vol 1 opens, however, with the first issues of the series, introducing us to Spider Jerusalem, journalist who has turned from the profession and is living as a hermit - looking like Alan Moore and living miles away from The City that he describes as being a modern - sometime in the 23rd century - version of Sodom, a place that he both loves and loathes with equal fervor.

    Spider returns to the City at the urgings of his lawyers and again signs on to write columns for his old editor.  From there he shaves his wild man beard and cuts his long hair revealing himself to be far closer to a mid-70s Hunter S Thompson clone, a journalist whose best work is completed between drug experiences and published without editing, speaking to the immediate impact that an effective wordsmith can have - particularly as Spider defuses a police riot by being the only observer reporting on the brutal actions of the police force.

    Spider is nothing if not an excessive homage to Hunter Thompson, constantly yelling about the corrupt government, firing guns into the sky, taking anything and everything available to him, and befriending the least socially acceptable people in The City.  The pacing of his words is familiar to me as I've read enough Hunter, and even his wikipedia article points out the obvious parallels between the fictional and all-too-real gonzo journalists.

    Supposedly, the rest of the series flows into a single story arc in which Jerusalem fights the good fight against a corrupt President.  I hope that something comes because, while the patter and pacing of the comics so far have been enjoyable, the lack of furthering of the story has been a bit frustrating.


    Incorruptible - The initial tagline of Mark Waid's series Irredeemable was "What if the world's greatest superhero became the world's greatest villain?".  I've read the first three volumes of that series and am seeing something worth following there.  The shocking change of Plutonian (a Superman archetype) into a despotic murderer reveals a great deal about his background.

    In this companion piece, the tagline is reversed - "What if the world's greatest villain because the world's greatest superhero?" and we have a flipped transformation of Max Damage from scum of the earth into someone willing to set up resistance to the Plutonian's reign of terror.  The other significant difference in the storyline - other than the reversal of hero turning villain becoming villain turning hero - is that of the change's motivation.  Irredeemable gave us a complex backstory, revealed in dribs and drabs, allowing us to connect with the series.  Incorruptible instead offers us a switch motivated by the villain's fear of what the Plutonian could do now that he's gone mad.  No more complex reason than a single-panel transformation.

    This simplicity of motivation might be necessary for Waid to escape the challenge that he was simply remaking the same story in a mirror, but it doesn't make for compelling reading.  Every character looks at the now-hero's background and sees nothing that would have suggested the change that we are expected to accept without any compelling reason.

    I don't, and the story is boring because of it.

    Plus, the fact that the collections of both Incorruptible and Irredeemable are only four issues long is starting to rack me off.  Throwing in ten or fifteen pages of sketches and alternate covers doesn't make the collection a value.  It just stretches the content with crap.



    The Losers - I've not seen the movie based on this story, but I can tell from the previews alone that the adaptation must've been pretty true to this original.  Every note from the trailer can be found as part of this first volume of the series that has since ended.

    Simple enough story - military/CIA agents get set up by someone else in the agency and are now considered dead (or wanted for dead) by the agency that thinks they've betrayed them.  It's pretty much the same story that the A-Team had which made this past summer's pairing of the two movies coming out at the same time even more odd.

    The comic's entertaining enough, introducing the characters as they're on their first revenge heist against the government that has cut them off.  They steal a helicopter, meet a CIA informer (the front and center female from the cover to the left), and plan an even larger revenge heist that - of course - goes wrong when it turns out that the agency leaders don't have any idea why the titular Losers are trying to enact some payback.  That is no one at the agency other than the mysterious and perhaps-fictional Max who was behind the entire disavowing of the Losers.

    Pretty standard if wittily-written fare.


    Supreme: Story of the Year - This one is a re-read for me, spurred primarily by the comparison that Chris Sims made between this and All Star Superman in the linked article.

    Upon further reading, Supreme is not as good.  Yeah, it's excellent, but reading it a second time, knowing where it was going and knowing the twist that was coming (I'll not ruin it as the twist was so stunning on my first reading) made the re-read less enjoyable.

    The internal connections within Supreme are outstanding.  Moore clearly had the entire series (at least that collected here) mapped out from the get-go, and the payoffs are well worth the read.  It's just a little lesser than All Star.  Supreme didn't bring tears to my eyes on the second or third reading; All Star did.



    Cinderella: from Fabletown with Love - meh...

    The idea here - that Cinderella is really a super spy with more experience than any Mundy spy could possibly have but just poses as a socialite in order to appear harmless - is far more interesting than the series turns out to be.

    We get Cinderella teaming up with Aladdin - another spy who appears not to be - to solve the mystery of where a number of super powerful magic items have been coming into the Mundy world.  There are a few entertaining quips and well-drawn action sequences, but on the whole the mini-series was boring.

    I'm looking forward to the next edition of the main Fables series, but that doesn't come out until December.

    It's too long to be stuck with this stuff as a substitute.


    Youth in Revolt - In which Michael Cera plays Michael Cera.

    But at least he does get a chance to also play a more confident version of Michael Cera as Francois, his inside-his-head alter ego necessary to be bad.

    Funny film about a wildly inexperienced, twee boy who finds the love of his young life while on vacation but has to turn into a bad boy in order to get back to her.  His bad boy actions are well over the top - including burning down a local business district and eventually attempting to fake his own death.

    Cera is hilarious as the affected teen whose lifestyle choices almost guarantee that he'll never meet a girl his own age who will be interested in him.  When he does finally find his Sheeni - who's into French cinema and deep poetry and is far too mature for her age - Cera's Nick Twisp is out of his depth but head over heels.  His mother heads home, inadvertently separating the two young lovers, and Cera sets his loosely thought out plot into motion only to see said plot snowball out of control as his alter ego takes over.

    The two leads are excellent as are the supporting actors - Steve Buscemi, Jean Smart, Zach Galifianakis, Fred Willard, Ray Liotta, Justin Long, and especially Adhir Kalyan.  Everything moves along with a nice pace until the last scene or two when things slow to a resolution.

    The Girl and I both very much enjoyed this one, even found ourselves laughing out loud a number of times.  I'd even recommend checking the deleted scenes as there's a particular reworking of a diner scene that's hilarious.

    Strong recommend...


    Daredevil: The Devil's Hand - Second Daredevil read of the last few weeks.  The other, Return of the King, is barely even worth mentioning.  King is the same old, same old for Hornhead - life goes in the crapper as a number of people who know his unsecret identity choose to attack him from both sides of his life.  Blah, blah, blah.

    King did, however, serve as a plate cleaning, wiping away most of the ongoing storylines and setting up Double D to take over as leader of The Hand, a mystical, ninja-themed, mercenary group bent to world domination.  Daredevil thinks he's use The Hand to do good - policing the streets of New York, killing those who are above the law, and eventually changing the direction of The Hand themselves.

    The Hand, of course, think otherwise.  In this volume, Daredevil begins to consolidate his power in the New York area, running afoul of the local police as well as Norman Osborne's HAMMER troops.  Aided by Black Tarantula and White Tiger, Daredevil sets his initial plans in motion and has to prove himself a worthy leader by being willing to kill - or at least convince The Hand of his willingness.

    In the second half of the story, Daredevil and White Tiger travel to Japan to meet with The Hand's five regional leaders and draw them to his side.  Above these five and Daredevil, however, there turns out to be a no-so-secret cabal of Hand elders who have other plans and suggest among each other that they are really the ones pulling Daredevil's strings all along.

    I love the dark, sketchy quality of the artwork throughout the first half of this volume, very strong and fitting of the New York setting.  The artwork changes for the trip to Japan but retains the dark tone.  Both are equally effective.

    Finally, this is a Daredevil story that doesn't rely on the old tropes of Matt Murdock's life falling down around him.  I'm actually eager to follow the next bunch of trades into Daredevil's Shadowland.

    First time in a while that I've been excited to follow DD.  Good to see this happening again.



    Chew - Last one for today...promise...

    Best new read of the week (not as good as Supreme, though)...Tony Chu is a detective and a cibopath - a person who gets psychic impressions from whatever he eats.  Kinda makes it a necessity for him to munch on dead bodies, fingers found at murder scenes, even a decomposing dog from the crime lab.

    And it's funny.

    I'm tellin' ya, it's really funny.

    Well worth reading.

    I'm two volumes in an wish the third collection were already out, but it's not just yet.  Sadly.

    Funny stuff.

    August 23, 2010

    Why adaptation is tough...

    Ok, let's start with the sad, honest truth.

    The Girl and I now own the six books of Scott Pilgrim.  For an investment of about $44, we have all six volumes of the Scott Pilgrim series.  No, you can't borrow them because they're already on loan.

    We own the books because the Scott Pilgrim film was set to come out last weekend, and book three hadn't yet come in from the library.  We'd both read books one and two and had four through six waiting on the table.

    With less patience than me even, The Girl put in the simple order to Amazon and waited for the package to show up.  They arrived early last week, just a day after she brought book three back from the Clifton library.

    And the books waited...sitting on the table, taunting us until the end of the week when we could sit on opposite ends of the couch from each other and devour the remaining four books in one sitting Friday night, she reading the new copies from Amazon, me taking in the library's lightly used versions.  Well, I went in one sitting as I kinda read a little more quickly (my four books were finished while she cruised through two and had to finish up the next morning.)

    First off, the books are outstanding.  The promise shown by the first two that I reviewed a little while back was totally seen through to the end.  In fact, the third and fourth books are far more impressive than the first two.  The levels of background that O'Malley works into both Scott and Ramona are phenomenal, making some of the more well-rounded post-college aged character that I've read in a while.  These are characters who are looking to define themselves - Ramona, in particular - and trying to shed their baggage along the way.

    Plus they're hilarious and fully willing to make the occasional meta-joke as when Scott comments that fighting the evil exes is tiring and that he wished this (I won't tell you which) book could be the last one or when Scott refuses to catch a character up on what's been going on, instead stating simply that they should go back and read book one.  This is really funny stuff that never devolves into rote "meet ex-boyfriend, fight ex-boyfriend, repeat" as would've been so easy for O'Malley's series to slide into.  Every evil ex is a unique character who must be dealt with in unique ways.  This is the good stuff, folks: hilarious, rounded, well done from tip to tail.

    Do yourself a favor and spend the three or four hours needed to read this series from start to finish.  With volume six having come out this summer, it's available in its entirety for dirt cheap.

    Once you're done with it, check out O'Malley's interview over on Comics Alliance.  Don't read it until you're all through, though as it contains some serious spoilers.  Great interview that lent a lot of depth to my reading of the final volume.

    Now, about the Scott Pilgrim vs the World movie adaptation.

    It's good.  It's fun.  It's a solid adaptation.  It has pretty much all the entertaining scenes that you'd mark as necessary if you went through the books and asked for those kinds of scenes.  It's just, well, lacking the heart.

    This isn't the first two Harry Potter flicks.  It's not like the director missed the point and sucked all the life out of the film.  It's also not Watchmen where the ending had to be changed which necessitated eliminating almost all the subtext along the way and the core premise of the entire book - that superheros don't exist and the non-super heroes would be helpless once they did - was intentionally changed for the movie.

    No, this is a very fun film that absolutely nails the spirit, language, moves of the books in every way.  The fight scenes are phenomenally well adapted with most of the evil exes stealing the fight scenes in every way.  Their on screen representations are note perfect from Todd's Vegan powers to Lucas Lee's stunt doubles and through every other ex we see (with the slight exception of Kyle & Ken Katayanagi who are fairly well under-used).

    And the fight scenes are awesome.  The sight of Scott levitating away on vegan psychic waves, Romana moving Scott as a puppet, the first fight/dance battle - they're all excellently well adapted as are all of the exciting scenes that would 'just have to be in' this movie.

    It's actually the scenes that aren't in the movie, however, that I missed the most.  By necessity - and as #3 warned us - the movie is drastically compressed.  The comic series takes just over a year (we know from Knives's almost bookending birthday celebrations), and the movie shrinks this time frame into just more than a week.  Yes, the fact that all the fights come one on top of each other makes Michael Cera's increasingly haggard reactions all the more reasonable, but it also means that - as #4 warned us - we lose a ton of characterization in the process.

    Out the window goes the sixth book's discussion between Ramona and Scott in subspace.  Eliminated is the side plot of Todd's dalliance with the drummer.  Gone entirely is Scott's reaction to Ramona's departure at the beginning of book six.  Poof goes the torture of Steven Stills and his recording process.  Away with Scott's whole backstory with Kim Pine.  Reduced is Envy from most significant, sympathetic supporting character to one-note villain.  Plus there's the fact that she's a blond in the movie but a red-head in the books - a sad change for me to have seen.

    Yes, some of these are subplots and side trails that are simply victims of sadly necessary for adaptation streamlining, but they aren't all subplots.  Some of the content lost is actually the meat of the story.  Yes, if you had to describe the books to someone, you might shorthand things as "a boy has to fight his girlfriend's evil exes in a real-world version of her baggage", but a description of the books as such would leave out entirely the true meaning and heart of the story, that of Scott's growth and realization that no one's memories - most importantly his own - ever match the memories of the people in his past.  He - and Ramona and the evil exes, Young Neil, Knives and even we - have fashioned our memories into stories that sell us just slightly better, make us a little more handsome or beautiful, and let us be the hero in our own drama, and in the end, Scott realizes this.

    The books are a story of growth.  The movie mentions this growth almost in passing in the final act.  Where the written story took the time necessary to reveal this growth bit by bit and to point it out in the final chapter, the movie simply doesn't have the ability to let that growth develop organically.  Instead, the writers include this growth largely as a surprise in the final battle.  No, I don't necessarily fault them for this.  Their hands were somewhat tied by virtue of the nature of their medium.  The film is a week.  We don't grow in a week's time.  We grow over much longer time frames than a film like this can allow.

    This wasn't Watchmen where I thought the change for filmic adaptation was foolish and arbitrary, taken for the name of making the action scenes that much more exciting and over the top.  This is a change necessitated by the mere process of adaptation.  In that it is imminently more forgivable.

    Scott Pilgrim vs the World is a very good, fun movie.  Scott Pilgrim the book series is excellent.

    Check out some other reviews of the film if you wanna...

    There's also the Robot Chicken animation of Scott's past with Kim Pine...





    I'm absolutely tempted to go right out and ebay the Scott Pilgrim & Ramona plushes and the action figures once they're out.

    August 17, 2010

    Thoughts on a passing


    It's been a rough year or so at Princeton.  Since last winter, we've lost three students - two seniors to car accidents (last school year) and one this past weekend.  The short story - and I don't know many more details - is that the student had an asthma attack on Wednesday evening and was taken to the hospital where he was in critical condition with limited - if any - brain function until he passed away Saturday evening.  We'd gotten an initial report on Thursday morning from our principal who stated at the time that they had pulled the young man's schedule from our computer system, telling us that things weren't likely to get any better without him actually telling us exactly that.

    I've taught fourteen years now - just starting my fifteenth year - and can remember most of those years without a current student passing away during the school year.  I was speaking to one of my students from last year, another junior-to-be last Thursday and told him that when he asked if this was normal.  He didn't say it with any pleading but just with a kind of simple questioning, trying to figure out if what he'd seen was what every high school student sees.

    It's not.  It's been a very rough streak for Princeton's students this past year, and it's been something that's been oddly distant from me because I haven't known any of the students at all.  Ryan - who passed last fall - was someone who photo I'd taken a few times at a football game.  Guadalupe - who passed in the spring - wasn't anyone I knew at all, couldn't even place a face or find a photo of her.  Jovante - who passed this weekend - was someone I'd spoken to in the hallway a few times but whose name didn't mean anything to me until Calen reminded me of a story about his involvement in Pasta for Pennies during his freshman year.

    I hope that he and his family and teachers won't mind me telling the one story that I knew of Jovante here.  If they do, I apologize in advance.  That year we had an incentive for the top freshman class.  The top freshman class got to join us at a pizza party that would have two other classes there.  We were always thrilled to reward the frosh because we always seemed to see those kids again as leaders of the campaign throughout their time at Princeton.  That year, there were two classes competing strongly for the top spot, but their competition was a friendly one.  The two teachers pushed their respective classes forward but shared every opportunity, splitting store collection opportunities.

    On the final day, the two teachers' classes were neck and neck, and Jovante brought in a donation that would have pushed his class ahead at the last moment.  The teachers got together and asked Jovante for permission to split his donation between the classes so that the two classes would end up in a perfect tie - the same amount raised by the same number of students.  He agreed, and the two classes both earned the pizza party.

    This would've been Jovante's junior year.  He would've been in my chemistry class.

    I'll miss getting to know him.

    Easily the oddest part of this passing for me is that it was news, not the kind of news that says "local high school student in critical condition" but the kind of news that says "son of famous athlete is in critical condition".  For those of you who aren't Princeton people, Jovante was Ickey Woods's son, so Jovante's passing was local news and even - as the screen cap at the top of this post shows - small national news.  I was shocked to see the headline on the side of the ESPN homepage on Sunday.

    And I don't like that it was news.

    I understand that some events like this - another local student passed away this past week when his car flipped as he was driving 130 miles per hour on the interstate - are news.  They shut down the interstate.  They intrigue people.  They serve as warnings. 

    This passing was tragic and random.  Jovante had an asthma attack.  He was an athlete.  He was healthy.  He hadn't done anything wrong.  And he's gone.

    That isn't news, and I didn't like seeing it covered.  Even though the coverage was tasteful - the Enquirer's series of articles and ESPN's pair - it felt wrong.  This was a kid in my school.  This wasn't someone who gets mentioned on ESPN's website.

    But he was.

    The first day of school wasn't bad - especially considering the loss that we suffered over the weekend.  I saw a number of shirts with Jovante's name or football number, a few haircuts with Jovante's number carved into them, a few folders with Jovante's name.  The students had a few places around school where they could write memorial messages, and we heard that there will likely be a memorial held at the school in a couple of weeks.

    A few years ago, we had a teacher - the boys basketball coach - pass away suddenly overnight.  I wasn't at school the next day, but I heard a number of stories about how tough a day that was.  

    We've gotten a new principal since then, and while I don't always agree with the decisions he makes, he's sadly becoming really good at helping our school grieve.  In every case, he's been very proactive, opening the school over the weekend to let the kids start grieving together as soon as possible.  We've worked with the families to hold public memorials or to assist in any way that we could while making sure to respect the families' wishes.

    I hate that we're getting good at this.

    I haven't attended either grieving session - this weekend for Jovante or last winter for Ryan.  These weren't my students.  These weren't people I knew. 

    The closest I've come to helping with the grieving was a few years ago at Joey's funeral (I mentioned it in a post at the time).  I remember feeling absolutely helpless to help my students - and Joey was one of mine, the mourners were mine - in any way other than to be there, to grieve with them. 

    This time I'm helping by offering stability, normalcy, a regular school day.  It's probably a cop out because it's the same thing I'd be doing even if nothing had happened this weekend.

    I hope it's enough.

    May 18, 2010

    Check the Cool Wax

    Update: The direct links to files hosted on Check the Cool Wax have been removed as per a cease and desist order.  Read the full details of the order here.

    Oh, my gollies...

    You have to Check the Cool Wax.

    We're talking hours and hours of time lost in my life from just today alone. I've never been there before, but I know I'm going to be spending a whole crapload of time there in the future.

    The concept is a simple one. Some guy - no clue who he is other than my frickin' hero - has taken a bunch of music from old LPs and 78s and 45s and burned them into mp3 format, which he then posts.

    We're talking stuff like...
    • A disco Wonder Woman theme
    • William Shatner Live
    • Joe Piscipo and Eddie Murphy together
    • Jerry Reed's "The Bandit"
    • Dean Martin doing "I Walk the Line"
    • Beasite Boys "She's On It" which didn't appear on cd until the Sounds of Science compilation
    • Mel Torme's "Secret Agent Man"
    • Pee Wee's "Surfin' Bird"
    • The Merry Marvel Marching Society
    • Old Beastie Boys commercials
    • Rappin' Rodney Dangerfield
    Honestly, I could post hundreds and hundreds of links from this that entertained me. Go, spend an hour or two on broadband and have a blast.

    November 4, 2008

    Don't leave a comment


    The Cincinnati Enquirer's website has undergone some radical changes over the past year or two, something that was covered in Wired magazine a little while ago.

    They've combined all their local newspapers (formerly the various community papers including the Princeton-area Tri-County Press) into the one website, no longer offering up individual homepages for each. And they've - more noteworthy - also encouraging a lot of what they call citizen journalism which seems to end up being a whole lot of people doing stupid and mostly non-newsworthy self promotion and a lot of very poorly-written local interest articles.

    Seriously, look at this piece of crap. There are nothing but short sentences, not a single combination into an actual paragraph. It's like something written by a middle schooler.

    The lack of actual reportage - and any sort of consideration for what is worth reporting and what isn't - isn't, however, my beef for tonight. That'll be for another time as we consider the dichotomy between what people want to see/read/hear and what they need to be told. Instead, my complaints for today lie entirely with their increased offerings of comments on every news story.

    Take, for example, the comments recently left on a story about the Lakota contract talks:
    When are teachers going to realize the make good money? Hey, I haven't had even a cost of living increase in over FIVE years! Do you hear my complaining? No, I understand it's tough out there right now. These teachers who are already making a LOT more than I ever will are never happy. Look, if you don't like being a teacher find another career! But you will quickly find that there isn't much out there which you will make more money. Yes, times are tough....grow up and deal with it like the rest of us. Or does it just kill you to drive home in your big SUV, pull into your huge garage, and then take the family out to eat? Yea, I bet. Spoiled teachers.....sheesh!

    ...

    Be sure to have a full knowledge base of any situation before you rattle off a half-brained response. Don't assume the media has all of the information you need to be fully aware.

    ...

    This sounds like sour grapes to me! I was curious do you have your masters degree? If not... Why don't you go back to school and get your master's degree so you can have a big SUV, huge garage, and go out to eat every night. Please do some more research before you make comments like the one you spewed out above.
    We have a craptacular initial comment, one designed to set a tone of only the lowest level of discourse. It's an ignorant rant, practically designed to pick a fight. And it's dumb.

    The Enquirer has added the opportunity for people to have intelligent discourse replying to any of the topics that the site covers, but they haven't set anything in place to prevent this kind of asinine, lowest-common-denominator commentary - which is what I find most common to the comment section. And then we get two people saying "oh, you should be more open-minded" when they should really be ignoring the moron and just letting him scream into the ether without response.

    See, it's way easier to smack on people if you don't have to see them face to face.

    Newspapers - and by extension news websites - should not be for the reporting of every mundane detail of the world nor as forums for every opinion to be bandied about without concern for the factual basis of that opinion.

    As much as I want everyone to be free to report and to inform each other - it's important for our freedoms that we have some outlets - I also want there to be some sort of established news entity that can provide a researched, resourced, filtering of what is happening in my world, and a bulletin board service with commentary is not that entity.

    Randall had it right.

    September 11, 2008

    I don't understand

    There probably aren't a couple hundred people on the planet who really understand what's happening at the LHC in CERN this week.

    I know I don't really.

    I mean, I get what a particle accelerator is. I understand how it moves particles faster and faster in a ring using magnets to push everything forward. I even get that they have two rings moving particles in opposite directions until the collision.

    I don't really understand how they track what happens.

    I don't really understand how the interpret what those results tell them.

    And I have no frickin' clue why any of the new agencies have been covering whatever this week's big experiment is.

    But I am happy that it's cartoon fodder...

    from my favorite webcomic (to which I can't link because they aren't all as school-appropriate as this one it)...

    And from webcomic #2 in my heart...

    And then there's the ever so simple explanation found here...

    May 30, 2008

    The cheese factor is set on high, sir


    Aw, man...enjoy the awesomeness of Italian Spider-man on alrugo.com.

    Or, at least, enjoy the awesomeness once their back online after they get the little bandwidth exceeded problem all sussed out.

    It's as if you throw Ron Jeremy and James Bond into a blender with a shot of 70's and Land of the Lost then labeled it Spider-Man.

    There can be no more awesome thing on the interwebs at the moment.

    Trust me on this one.

    I mean...dude...aw man...awesome...give it a day to come back online or check it as it's posted on YouTube, but then you'll miss their other new series.

    April 7, 2008

    How to avoid web traffic


    So, let's say that one of your newspaper photogs - probably a freelancer because you're too cheap to send people all over the communities you serve - takes a really cool photo of this weekend's Kite Fest (no, I didn't go - got busy, shut up).

    What do you do?

    Do you put it up in a slideshow on your website? Sure...

    Do you put up an alternate slideshow view but without the ability to let people save the photo? Okay, I can even get down with that.

    Do you provide a link so that people can buy a copy of the photo - likely not to pass the cash along to the photographer? Fine, whatever...

    But at least provide the option to link directly to that photo of the slideshow so I don't have to tell people that it's slide #6 in the show and ask them to click through five far more pedestrian photos first.

    That, my friends, is how to make sure that your website doesn't get any more traffic than the absolute minimum - customer service.

    This month's Wired

    Skimming through this month's Wired...
    • Humans have been changing the climate for eons. There's reason for hope. - This short article posits that we've been changing climate for a lot longer than just since the Industrial Revolution but rather much, much longer - since the development agriculture which lead to the first part of our recent, sharp increase in CO2 levels and then the development of rice paddy farming which lead to another spike, in methane levels. If it's true, it means we've been terraforming far longer than most of us believe we have been. It also means that we might be more likely to undo what we've done.
    • Futurist Ray Kurzweil Pulls Out All the Stops (and Pills) to Live to Witness the Singularity - This guy's crackers. He's thinking that within his lifetim - and he's doing everything possible to extend that lifetime so he'll be around - computing power will increase enough that he can make himself eternal by dropping his conscious into electronic media. Crackers - and Wired just about says so in the sidebar with the article.
    • Wired's Geekster Handbook, a Field Guide to the Nerd Underground - I certainly recognize a few of these geek types from 'round PHS.
    • Clive Thompson on Why the Next Civil Rights Battle Will Be Over the Mind - An interesting proposal by Thompson pondering whether the growing ease of use of truth-detecting equipment will someday make us consider whether we have freedom to lie, to think dishonest thoughts. Let's hope that we take some precautions before it becomes an issue.
    • Test: 1080p Projectors for Less, Pared-Down Multitools, VHS-to-DVD Converters - The Girl and I have talked about out next TV - and we will need to replace things within the next year (or go for a converter box) - and considered replacing our current one with an LCD projector, so we're going to have to do some research in this area. The biggest initial issue (other than the $$ requeired) is trying to get it to receive the signals as most projector's don't have any sort like that - at least we'll need a second bit of equipment stuck up there to the ceiling. Plus it still looks like it's going to be a pricey investment.
    • Hype Machine: Searching for ZAP's Fleet of No-Show Green Cars - Now there's a charlie foxtrot (look it up, I'm not linking). The electric car has been right around the corner for decades now, and I certainly don't see more of them driving around than I saw when I was young. This company has, however, or at least the couple of folks at the top of the company have made a buttload of money on promising folks electric cars left and right for the past decade. It's a cautionary tale for folks looking to do a little green investing.
    I do dig the subscription to Wired as it's the only magazine to which I currently subscribe. It's an interesting read through the world of tech and tech-science each month. Good stuff.

    Weirdly, however, Wired.com isn't the magazine. Apparently they're now different business interests, and the magazine is Wired.com/wired. Odd but good to know.ul>

    March 11, 2008

    Probably more thought than the topic deserves

    When all the archetypes burst in shamelessly, we reach Homeric depths. Two clichés make us laugh. A hundred clichés move us. For we sense dimly that the clichés are talking among themselves, and celebrating a reunion. Just as the height of pain may encounter sensual pleasure, and the height of perversion border on mystical energy, so too the height of banality allows us to catch a glimpse of the sublime. Something has spoken in place of the director. If
    nothing else, it is a phenomenon worthy of awe.
    Just under a year ago, Mike B of clapclap.org wrote a phenomenal piece on the prevelance of "Hallelujah" in television and movie sadness montages.

    The piece is amazingly well written, phenomenally thorough, and a work of absolute genius. It is a bit long, I warn you, but it's well worth it.

    And it got me to check out Mike's full blog with other writings about post-80's cartoons, a masters class on a single scene of Freaks and Geeks, an analysis of That's My Bush, and lots more.

    Outstanding stuff, man...and intermittent enough that I can follow along.


    SeeqPod - Playable Search

    December 20, 2007

    Who're you listening to?


    The question isn't what are you listening to but rather who are you listening to?

    On Tuesday, the FCC voted to remove the rule that formerly blocked corporations from owning newspapers and television/radio in the same media market, a rule that has existed for three-plus decades and has guaranteed that there would be at least a few voices in every market.

    Currently, ten gigantic corporations own a massive and frightening portion of our media. For example, when you pop open an issue of Time, Life, People, or any DC Comic series; watch the WB, HBO, Cinemax, TBS, or TNT; check a Warner Brothers movie; listen to music on any of forty record labels; or looking at the interwebs via AOL; you're opening up your mouth and getting baby-birded from AOL/Time Warner. And there are nine other massive corporations that have been gobbling up a media left and right, attempting to guarantee that whenever and wherever we turn, we're getting our messages from them.

    And the FCC isn't allowing it.

    The FCC is encouraging it.

    The FCC which has been, throughout its seventy-year history, charged with ensuring that the media of the realm is used to contribute to the good of the people is instead ensuring that our media is instead used for the good of the corporations.

    This is in spite of a national tour in which the FCC director himself asked to hear public opinion on the relaxation of media ownership rules, a tour in which he heard almost universal condemnation of further conglomeration.

    And the director didn't seem to care in the least.

    We need a new director.

    We need a new president to appoint that new director.

    We need to be angry because we're about to be controlled even further.

    We need NPR and PBS and every independent radio and television station, internet streamer, and newspaper publisher possible.

    And you need to check out this past week's Bill Moyers Journal to learn more.

    And until then, go listen to some Steve Earle and Eric Idle tunes, would ya?

    Countdown to 1000: Six posts to go...right at half a dozen...and with five days to Christmas, I'm going to have to double post a day to spot on with the holiday. I'm good with that, though, because I'm not working for the next two weeks.

    December 19, 2007

    A list of lists - 'cause we're Americans

    I am currently down with Time's Fifty Top 10 Lists of 2007.

    It's a list of best-of lists.

    It's what Americans were made to make.

    Somehow it's in our natural culture to make top-ten lists.

    We list things the way that the British qeue up...the way Bangladeshis (sp?) put up with monsoons.

    We are total beasts at it.

    If we can't somehow rank it, we can't possibly enjoy it to the fullest extent.

    So we turn this week to Time magazine's Fifty Top Ten Lists of 2007.

    In these lists, we get to know that drug-resistance TB was a bigger underreported story than Angola's growing economy. 'Cause we need to know that kind of stuff.

    Mit Romney's hunting exageration was a bigger campaign gaffe than John McCain singing "Bomb, Bomb, Bomb...Bomb, Bomb, Iran".

    That The Lives of Others is nearly the best film of the year - no matter what Katydid says.

    That I have only seen two of the eighteen movies listed as top. Clearly I should be seeing more movies.

    I should also be reading more because the entire top ten books list is a blank to me and I really, really want to read The World Without Us, but the only ones I've read is Then We Came to the End - which is, admittedly, awesome - and HP & the Deathly Hallows - which was pretty good, too.

    That frickin' Amy Winehouse song has an awesome chorus and sound. Speaking of which, I need to listen to more stuff because the only songs or albums I knew were both by Feist.

    And they've got great taste in graphic novels, finally a category with which I'm familiar with #3, #5, and #6 - which has come to grow on me.

    In a truly shocking development, global warming seems to be a bit of a bit deal - bigger, even, than a plane crash. Imagine that...

    We know that Don't tase me, bro is a better t-shirt slogan than I have a wide stance - a fact about which I would disagree.

    And we know that the most awkward moment of 2007 was the Columbia president's intro of Iranian president Ahmadinejad - more so, even, than Rudy-9/11's daughter supporting Barack.

    Plus, there are some things on the list that I don't understand at all. Seriously, a mud volcano?!?!

    And how does colony collapse disorder not get the #1 most under-reported story?

    And that doesn't even begin to deal with Rolling Stone's Forty Reasons We Loved Television in '07.

    Oh, the crappiest part of the entire fifty top ten lists is that there's nowhere you can see any of the lists in its entirety at once...which is its #1 shortfall.

    Countdown to 1000: Seven posts still to go - seven of the most outstanding things you're gonna read ever...EVER...EVER...

    November 7, 2007

    Something seems not right here


    I found the above picture in looking through the Reuters Best Photos of the Day for yesterday. it's photo #21 if you go hunting.

    The caption that goes with the photo reads thusly:
    French lawyers clash with policemen as they protest against a judiciary reform during a visit by the Minister of Justice Rachida Dati in Colmar, eastern France, November 5, 2007. (FRANCE)

    REUTERS/Vincent Kessler
    I'm all good and well with lawyers protesting. In fact, it's the second photo of the day to show lawyers protesting somewhere in the world, the other being one of Pakistani lawyers (#5 in the slide show) protesting the country's recent crackdown on just about everything that would fall under the banner of freedom.

    It's a little weird to see lawyers protesting, sure. And it's a little weird to see folks protesting in gowns or - in the Pakistani photo shown at the bottom of this post - in a suit. But the French lawyer photo just seems to have something else wrong with it. The lawyers all look like they're having a fun time jousting with the police. They're grinning and look like they might even be laughing. One of them is even cheesing for the camera. In another photo from the same event, even the police seem to be grinning and taking the "protest" pretty jovially.

    Leave it to the French to screw up a good protest. Sheesh...

    Here's the Pakistani lawyer photo, by the by...


    Now that's a protest.

    or a new dance step...

    I am totally going to hell for that last comment, aren't I?

    June 29, 2007

    Culture is dead! Long live culture!

    Yet again, today's post comes from a recent NPR story, this one about an Andrew Keen's new book The Cult of the Amateur: how today's internet is killing our culture.

    The interview was fascinating - you can listen here - was fascinating, and not just because the author's got a fabulous British accent.

    Keen's first lengthy statement, in response to a question asking "let's make sure we're all on the same page here...overall, just give us a brief description of the problem you have with this interactive version of the web"...
    My problem is that [Web 2.0] fundamentally undermines the authority of mainstream media. We are seeing two things going on simultaneously: the rise of this user-generated content which is unreliable and often corrupt and a crisis in professional journalism, professional recorded music, newspapers, radio stations, television, and publishing. And that is the core of our culture. Once we undermine the authority and expertise and professionalism of mainstream media, all we have is opinion, chaos, a cacophany of amateurs.
    This is an isssue that I have been considering for a fair while now: the move from professional creation of news, media, and entertainment to a society where all entertainment and news is created equally and amateurly, challenging us to sort through so much dreck to find any kernel of wisdom or quality news. The increasing volume of information out there, with a corresponding withering of, to quote Keen, the wisdom of the professional frightens me because the sheer volume of crap out there will likely make it tougher and tougher to find what matters, what is important.

    In a professional culture, the ratio of signal to noise is managable. We know that some of what we see and hear is without merit, but so much of it is with merit that we can trust our media by default, knowing that the incidents of untrustworthiness are few and far between enough that they will be brought to our attention when the are found.

    In an amateur culture, however, the signal to noise ratio shifts drastically in favor of the noise, meaning that we must, by default, distrust our media, hoping to find the tiny amounts of worthwhileness that rise above the miasma.

    But how will we find that?

    Who will point out what is good, what is worthy, what is trustable if the only people I hear from are people whom I trust no more than I do myself?

    If I am the news media (I've already begun blogging. What's to stop me from newsblogging?), then why would I trust the words of someone else's news? I know my biases. I know when I'm stretching the truth. I know when I'm talking without a lot of facts to back up my opinions. How do I know that the other people talking back to me aren't doing the same?

    I look forward to reading Keen's book, and I continue to wait for 2014.

    June 26, 2007

    In honor of...#7...

    If ever there was a science guy who has used the medium of television (and more recently the magical interweb) to promote both himself and science, that science guy would have to be Steve Spangler.

    Spangler was a classroom teacher for a dozen years but has now moved on to be the Director of the National Hands-on Science Institute in Denver and a consultant for the Littleton Public Schools near Denver.

    And he is the current media scientist darling, and rightfully so.

    Spangler's media savvy and affable personality - as well as his regular appearances on local morning shows and national network shows - has sent him into a decent amount of fame, particularly among the science teacher community. Spangler has even begun to parlay that into marketing science products in his name.

    Spangler maintains a blog where he points out interesting science things, though the blog isn't all that interesting as he knows he's fully in the public eye. Luckily that same website has a large repository of experiments from Steve...

    Snacks4theBrain! 51 - weird vocal science...


    Gravity Defied Goo Video...


    His mentos & diet coke compilation...


    From Donald Duck to Barry White...

    Hydrogen and Oxygen...

    Pop Rocks science...

    Make Your Own Bubbling Lava Lamp...

    Bernouli's Principle...

    Instant Worms...

    Go check out more yourself...